I Disagreed With Governor Raghuram Rajan – But I Salute Him!


As Raghuram Rajan ends his 3-year-term as the RBI Governor, Raghav Bhal writes about Rajan’s moves, he disagreed with. (Photo: <b>The Quint</b>)
As Raghuram Rajan ends his 3-year-term as the RBI Governor, Raghav Bhal writes about Rajan’s moves, he disagreed with. (Photo: The Quint)

I Disagreed With Governor Raghuram Rajan – But I Salute Him!

It was towards the end of 2013 or early 2014; the exact date doesn’t quite matter. I had trekked across to RBI at Mumbai to greet the hugely accredited new governor – the young and strapping Raghuram Rajan. I had first encountered his awesome reputation at the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago where I had gone to speak about my book Superpower? The Amazing Race Between China’s Hare and India’s Tortoise.

Almost a dozen students asked if I had met their iconic professor and author of Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy, a book immortalised as the “predictor” of the 2008 Post-Lehman Crash. Of course, I had read reviews about the book, but had not met its creator. Now, waiting in the efficiently redecorated RBI office, I was about to meet the man.

How Could I Question God?

Rajan entered with a warmly outstretched hand, and a charming smile. Gosh, he was even more handsome than his photographs, and a tad bigger/taller than I had expected. We got chatting. As with almost every conversation around that time, it was about Narendra Modi and whether he would become prime minister. Rajan had never met the Gujarat chief minister. That gave me a vaguely superior tone, since I had had several encounters with Modi, thanks to his energetic engagement with the media ever since he had been anointed the BJP’s Chosen One.

Rajan asked me probing questions about how I felt the polls would play out, what kind of a person/leader Modi was, would he be a moderniser, an instinctive reformer or an old school politician? But what happens in RBI must stay in RBI, so I shall say no more!

Raghuram Rajan has now ended his 3-year-term. He has won supreme laurels for his stint; and while I have disagreed with his interest rate policy more often than not, I must salute him for his professionalism and integrity. His admirers are legion.

Every time I would question his over-arching caution, academic homilies and textbook approach to inflation, I would get howls of protest from my young journalist colleagues, most shrilly from women reporters on the Mint Street beat. How could I question God?

Why Did I Disagree With Rajan?

So why did I disagree with Rajan, the “inflation warrior”? For one, I found his singular focus on using interest rates to tame inflation a theorem that works only in developed Western economies where everything is mapped within the organised, formal sector. And even here, the concept of “blind” inflation targeting is getting discredited and out of mode – read this week’s editorial in The Economist to understand how modern thinkers are now advocating Nominal GDP growth rates, instead of this “impotent” policy target.

Because a high interest rate chokes demand and kills new jobs, leading to a swelling army of unemployed people – however, in rich economies, they get social/welfare protection. But that’s utterly different from low income countries where the bulk of the activity is in the unorganised, informal sectors. Where high interest rates can end up ravaging the poor by throttling jobs. That’s the core of my quarrel with Rajan on inflation.

Every data point showed that spiralling food prices were the root cause of India’s inflation – the interest rate, therefore, was a blunt instrument, since it does precious little to put a harness on vegetable mandis. On the other hand, consumer prices of non-food products were rising at or less than 5 percent every year, which is perfectly healthy for a potentially fast-growing economy – so there wasn’t a case here for pressing the alarm button. Worse, crushed by high interest rates, producers’ prices were deflating for nearly fourteen months in a row, an unprecedented phenomenon in post-liberalisation India.

Therefore, ironically, even as Rajan thought he was battling for the poor, his uncompromising policy was actually crippling their aspirations. A struggling, deflating production sector was simply incapable of creating jobs. How I wish a star-struck media, instead of singing hosannas to Raghuram Rajan, had led him to meet Rohith Paswan somewhere in Bundelkhand.

Meet Rohith

Rohith is 24 years old. He is not a Brahmin. He sits smack in the middle of seven siblings, three brothers and sisters apiece. Last year, Rohith was married to Seema from a neighbouring village. Seema is now pregnant with their first child, who will join a growing army of six infants in the family. All the kids roll around in the courtyard of their four-room, pucca dwelling. The kids’ cries mingle with high-pitched sounds from Zee soap operas and Radio Mirchi songs to keep it cheerful and convivial.

Rohith’s family owns some land which is quite fertile. An irrigation canal runs close by, allowing the family to grow three crops in the year. The family employs farm labour which has paid its wages largely in food and some cash. The family eats reasonably well. Rohith’s eldest brother runs a tiny kirana stall near the bus stand. His other brothers, who worked at a sugar mill and cement kiln, just got laid off.

Both employers had shut shop since they could not meet high interest payments. Rohith is bored stiff, despite having a hundred friends who, too, are bored stiff. They practice dance steps, dream of winning India’s Got Talent, and desperately want to work. All of them eat reasonably well too; they can even do Michael Jackson’s Moonwalk. But there is only a foundation stone where there should have been a factory. The interest rate is too high.

India is teeming with Rohith Paswans. They would happily pay a thousand bucks extra for wheat and cabbage if only they could weld engines on a Volkswagen chassis – but the interest rate is too high.

(Disclosure: Rohith is a fictional character I made up to make my point!)

Okay, so you get it. I disagreed with Governor Rajan’s inflexible, theorem-dictated inflation policy. I am convinced that India would have done better with a higher level of inflation (and therefore a higher nominal GDP, thank you The Economist), since jobs, not lower food prices, kill poverty.

But I salute Governor Rajan for the institutional reforms he pioneered. His unrelenting drive to clean up banks’ bad loans will suck the jelly out of wobbly balance sheets. And perhaps he reserved the best for the last. The fact that he unveiled sweeping initiatives to finally create a thriving bond market in a $2 trillion economy speaks volumes about his unwavering focus until the very end.

Usually, people spend their last week in a job packing up, clearing papers and attending farewell dinners. But Governor Rajan unsheathed a raft of bold measures to do what hand-wringers had begun to say was impossible.

The often opaque, crony-like dealings between big corporations and banks will be ripped open and thrown under the ruthless scrutiny of transparent debt markets. Two decades ago, a Ramakrishna-led SEBI had cleaned up India’s clubby equity bourses. Now, Governor Rajan has sown the seeds of a similar revolution in the debt markets.

So long, Governor – my salute, my salaam! You shall be missed.

Raghav Bahl is the co-founder and chairman of Quintillion Media, including BloombergQuint. He is the author of two books, viz Superpower?: The Amazing Race Between China’s Hare and India’s Tortoise and Super Economies: America, India, China & The Future Of The World.

(This article was originally published in BloombergQuint)

(The Quint is now available on Telegram. For handpicked stories every day, subscribe to us on Telegram)

Follow our Opinion section for more stories.

    Also Watch