If you don't judge a book by its cover, why judge a film by its title? With his latest film Haraamkhor too running into trouble with the censors, Bollywood's most outspoken filmmaker, Anurag Kashyap, wonders whether it is our false morality and hypocrisy that really impedes freedom of expression.
The title is intriguing - as the Urdu word is more used in anger or derision than in polite conversation.
Asked about it, Kashyap, who is one of the producers of the film, told IANS in an email interview from Mumbai:
The word “haraamkhor” is not a gaali (abuse). It is a word that people normally speak... I think we have problems with how we perceive it, so it is our false morality and hypocrisy that get in our way.Anurag Kashyap, Filmmaker
“Let's translate 'haraamkhor' into English... (Then) everybody speaks it every day 10 times”, he added.
The movie, releasing on Friday, has been to film festivals in New York and Los Angeles, and across cities in India too, earning its share of praise for its story, its treatment by debutant director Shlok Sharma, and performances by Nawazuddin Siddiqui and Shweta Tripathi, who play a teacher and a student in a romantic relationship.
In a country where the guru-shishya tradition is often considered sacred, the film has already faced the music with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which refused to give it a certificate on the grounds that it had an objectionable theme.
But the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) last month gave it a green signal with a U/A certificate.
It's been a tough journey for the movie, which took off with crowdfunding via Facebook and was made with under Rs 1 crore.
"It is difficult to find exhibition (for a film with such a theme), and to try to explain why you are making this film to people who just see it on the surface. I think a lot of people also had a problem with the 'Haraamkhor' title without seeing the film,” Kashyap said.
CBFC had a problem with it, not even passing it (the film) because they thought the film was objectionable, whereas the contrary point of view is very different. Our biggest victory is that the film that they (CBFC) were not clearing has got a U/A certificate saying that it’s an important film for people to watch, and that can only happen in a higher court where people are intelligent, objective and understand that freedom.
Shot in a village in Gujarat, Haraamkhor seems to exude the flavours of the Indian hinterland. Interestingly, the rural milieu is finding increased space in the Hindi film industry.
I’m saying thank god rural milieu is finding space in cinema. Foreign representation is like travelling for entertainment. Cinema also has to be about the country it is from... Rural milieu gives you an identity that the film is from India and it is for Indians. And people want to watch that.
Does he think Bollywood's narration of love stories has undergone a mature transformation?
"See, the audience has grown up. Look at the success of Dangal. There is no love story in there, there are none of the usual traps in it and it is one of the biggest hits of all time.
You have to tell good stories and people are not telling good stories. I think the audience is mature, people are mature. Internet is one of the big reasons. I think everybody is mature apart from the censor board.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)