ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

Bombay HC to Hear Service Tax Dept’s Plea Against Vijay Mallya

The Service Tax Department filed a plea to recover government dues running into crores of rupees from Vijay Mallya.

Published
Hot News
2 min read
story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large
Hindi Female

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday it would hear the Service Tax Department’s plea to recover government dues running into crores of rupees from Kingfisher Airlines chief Vijay Mallya and other directors on March 11.

The petition filed by the Department also seeks freezing of Mallya’s passport and restrict his movement abroad. The petition was mentioned by Advait Sethna, a lawyer of the Service Tax Department before Justice CV Bhadang.

The department claimed in its petition that Mallya had collected large sums of money as Service Tax on behalf of the government from passengers travelling by Kingfisher Airlines. But he and other directors (of the airline) had not deposited the amount in the government treasury.

As they are defaulters of statutory tax, money has to be recovered from them, it said. It said Mallya’s term in Rajya Sabha expires on June 30 and that it had learnt from media reports that he was planning to go abroad and apprehended that he may not return.

Hence, the department pleaded that the high court should direct Mallya’s presence before it until the plea was decided and also until the trial in a magistrate’s court for recovery of Service Tax is over.

The department pleaded that it had filed two cases against Mallya in a magistrate court where the admitted liability of Kingfisher Airlines in respect of Service Tax dues was Rs 32.68 crore and Rs 23.38 crore respectively for different periods.While the first was being heard, the other one was still pending.

The department further pleaded the total disputed liability of Mallya in respect of Service Tax was to the tune of Rs 535 crore, although admitted liability was 56.06 crore (Rs 32.68 crore and Rs 23.38 crore).

The department also contended that if Mallya was not present in India for the trial then it would cause irreparable prejudice to the cases. Mallya and his airline had violated section 89(1)(d) read with other provisions of amended Finance Act, it pleaded.

(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)

0

Read Latest News and Breaking News at The Quint, browse for more from news and hot-news

Speaking truth to power requires allies like you.
Become a Member
3 months
12 months
12 months
Check Member Benefits
Read More