“We are constrained to express that it seems, that in its anxiety to suppress dissent, in the mind of the state, the line between the constitutionally guaranteed right to protest and terrorist activity seems to be getting somewhat blurred. If this mindset gains traction, it would be a sad day for democracy.”
This was an observation made by the Delhi High Court as they granted bail to student activists Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita, and Asif Iqbal Tanha in the main northeast Delhi riots ‘conspiracy’ case.
This case has been filed under the stringent anti-terror law – the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) – and registered under FIR 59, which deals with what the Delhi Police claims was an overarching ‘conspiracy’ behind the Delhi riots in February 2020.
Read Latest News and Breaking News at The Quint, browse for more from news and law
Topics: Ishrat Jahan Umar Khalid Sharjeel Imam
Published:

