The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the constitutionality of the electoral bonds scheme.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments about the constitutionality of the electoral bonds scheme.(Photo: Kamran Akhter/The Quint)
  • 1. How Does the Electoral Bond Scheme Work?
  • 2. Petitioners: Why the Electoral Bond Scheme is...
  • 3. Constitutional Issue I: The 'Right to Know'
  • 4. Constitutional Issue II: Manifest Arbitrariness
  • 5. Constitutional Issue III: The Money Bill Question
  • 6. Electoral Bonds Scheme is Constitutional and Good for the...
  • 7. How do the Arguments Before the Court Stack Up?
Are Electoral Bonds Constitutional? Here’s What You Need to Know

On Tuesday, 26 March, the Supreme Court was supposed to hear petitions challenging the constitutionality of the electoral bonds scheme, which came into operation from 2 January 2018. The matter has now been adjourned to 2 April.

The scheme allows individuals or corporations to purchase electoral bonds, which can then be provided to political parties. The bonds are bearer instruments, so the political parties just need to deposit them in their accounts to obtain the amount – the donor remains anonymous.

The Association for Democratic Reforms and Common Cause had filed a petition against the scheme in the Supreme Court after it was brought into law in the Finance Act 2017, in which they argue the scheme is “unconstitutional, illegal and void.”

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) – CPI(M) – also filed a petition against the scheme in 2018, in which they have argued that the scheme encourages corruption and removes safeguards meant to ensure transparency in electoral funding.

The Centre filed an affidavit in the apex court on 14 March 2019 in which it has argued that the scheme actually promotes transparency, and keeping donors anonymous is for their benefit.

Here is everything you need to know about the arguments, and the issues that the Supreme Court needs to consider.

  • 1. How Does the Electoral Bond Scheme Work?

    The petitions against electoral bonds are not just about the bonds themselves. The petitions also challenge the changes to our laws on disclosure of political donations in the Representation of People Act 1951, Companies Act 2013, Income Tax Act 1961 and RBI Act 1934. Most of these changes were brought in by the Finance Act 2017.

    The electoral bond scheme, therefore, needs to be viewed as a composite of the following elements:


    • Can be purchased from selected SBI branches on a quarterly basis. The value of each bond can be Rs 1,000, Rs 10,000, Rs 1 lakh, Rs 10 lakh or Rs 1 crore.
    • Any individual or corporation which satisfies certain KYC requirements can buy a bond; their name or other details are not entered on the instrument. The details furnished during KYC are supposed to be confidential, though they can be shared on demand of a competent court or a request by a law enforcement agency.
    • Every registered political party which received at least 1 percent of the vote at the previous Lok Sabha elections or state elections gets an account in which the bond amounts can be deposited within 15 days of their issue.

    Also Read : Experts Slam Modi Govt’s Reply to Electoral Bond Challenge in SC


    • Political parties don’t pay tax on “voluntary contributions” to them, provided certain details of such donations are properly maintained by them. Previously, the political parties had to maintain a record of all donations in excess of Rs 20,000, including the name and address of the donor (Section 13A, Income Tax Act).
    • However, Finance Act 2017 created an exception to this for donations greater than Rs 20,000 which are made through electoral bonds: not only are these tax exempt, the political parties don’t need to record the details of the donor.


    • Earlier, cash donations (which could remain anonymous) could be made to political parties in amounts up to Rs 20,000. This has now been reduced to a Rs 2,000 limit.
    • Any donations above Rs 2,000 have to be in cheque, bank transfers or electoral bonds.


    • Previously, there was a cap on the amount of money that a company could donate: 7.5 percent of its average net profits during the previous three financial years (first proviso to Section 182(1) of the Companies Act). This was meant to prevent shell companies from being set up to funnel money into political parties.
    • This cap was removed by Finance Act 2017.


    • Previously, companies needed to disclose the amount of money donated and the names of the political parties to which they donated money in their profit and loss accounts (Section 182(3) of the Companies Act).
    • However, the requirement to disclose the names of the political parties was removed by Finance Act 2017.


    • India has strict laws against political parties receiving funding from a “foreign source”. Under the old law in 1976 and the new law in 2010, political parties cannot even accept donations from an Indian company if it is a subsidiary of a foreign company.
    • Finance Act 2016 made a retrospective amendment to the 2010 law, which meant the restriction would not apply to such Indian subsidiaries if their share capital is below a specified amount. This limit was conveniently fixed in the relevant FEMA rules to exempt all donations to political parties from such companies till now.
    • Finance Act 2018 extended the retrospective protection all the way back to 1976.

    Also Read : SC Issues Govt Notice in Petition Seeking Stay on Electoral Bonds


Follow our Explainers section for more stories.

Also Watch