The National Food Security Act (NFSA) has been in place since 2013 and it was expected to mark a paradigm shift in the approach to food security, transforming it from a welfare to a rights-based concept. However, going by the recent nutritional indicators in the country, questions must be asked as to why the NFSA has not been able to prevent malnutrition. Unfortunately, the law has been reduced to providing the right to mere survival (with the cheapest minimum) rather than the right to a life free of nutritional deficiencies and ill-health. The right to good quality and quantity of nutrition should have been the premise of interventions and policy decisions, not just the right to food.
ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Members Only

Karnataka’s Child Malnutrition Crisis: Mere Survival Is Not the Point
Right to nutrition, and not just the right to food, should have been the premise of policymaking in India.

i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large
Become a Member to unlock
- Access to all paywalled content on site
- Ad-free experience across The Quint
- Listen to paywalled content
- Early previews of our Special Projects
×
×