Video Editor: Rahul Sanpui
Camera: Athar Rather
(This story was first published on 4 February, 2021. It has been republished from The Quint's archives on the occasion of International Women's Day.)
Imagine a job where you're working non-stop.
At a workplace where you are not eligible to avail leaves – even if you are terribly sick, sometimes.
And there is no looking forward to salary day – well, because you won't get paid for what you do.
Over 160 million women in India's patriarchal society already have been doing this 'job' for ages. For these women, cooking, cleaning, taking care of children and elderly, and all the other activities that require a household to function constitute their main occupation, according to Census 2011.
The Supreme Court in January 2021 said that woman's work at home must be placed on par with her office-going husband. The court said:
Actor-turned-politician Kamal Haasan too reignited the debate when he said women's labour must be recognised and they be paid a salary, as a part of his election pitch ahead of the upcoming polls in Tamil Nadu. This was backed by some like Congress leader Shashi Tharoor and slammed by a few others like actor Kangana Ranaut who said that women performed these chores out of “love and duty.”
While the debate is crucial all over the world, it is more so in India. In case the COVID-19 lockdown didn't make you realise this, here are a few big points of consideration, as per Time Use in India Report, 2019:
This 24*7*365 days running around is dismissed as "duty", as something homemakers do out of "love and care," completely ignoring the time and effort they put into it.
If you hire someone to do the following chores, you would be approximately be spending:
You would be spending Rs 45,000 on an average, every month.
This would be the estimated value of a homemaker's labour in any metro city in India.
This leads us to the fact that this entire work remains unrecognised and unaccounted for in the Indian economy.
And more than anything, this will help shatter the stereotypical image of Indian women who are portrayed as “domestic and social parasites living on their husbands’ earnings and contributing nothing.”
So the debate should ideally be not about whether or not homemakers be paid salary but:
We need to debate whether:
The policy should also focus on:
Back in 2012, it was suggested by the then Union government that homemakers will get salaries from their husbands.
This proposal never saw the light of the day. But if this were to be considered, it only increases male entitlement.
Demand for wages against housework was first raised in UK's Manchester nearly 50 years ago in 1972. In India, the conversation gained steam in 2012 and died a swift death. But without answering these pertinent questions through proper policy measures, we may still be discussing whether homemaker's labour should be monetised 50 years later – at the cost of millions of women, across generations.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)