India vs England: Analysing how India's five debutants Fared in the Test series against England.
(Photo: BCCI/Altered by The Quint)
Albeit India won their maiden Test series on Australian soil in 2019, the triumph in 2021 had a more pronounced impact. In a first, five players had made their Test debut for India in the same series. More importantly, their collective efforts helped India secure a 2-1 series win, including a transcendental Gabbatoir breach.
Let us now rewind the clock and revisit the performances of the quintet:
India vs England: Rajat Patidar is the only member of the debut quintet who could not meet expectations.
In a series featuring debutants aplenty who rose to the occasion, it is slightly disillusioning that the first debutant also happened to be the solitary member of the quintet who could not meet expectations. KL Rahul's injury presented Rajat Patidar with an opportunity in Visakhapatnam, and the first impression was far from underwhelming.
The Ranchi Test did not offer a reprieve either, as he scored 17 runs across the two innings combined, before missing the last Test with an injury. A modest total of 63 runs in six innings might not be enough to warrant selection in India’s next Test series, considering the likes of Virat Kohli and KL Rahul will be in the fray as well.
Rajat Patidar’s numbers in this series:
Matches – 3
Runs – 63
Average – 10.5
Highest Score – 32
India vs England: Sarfaraz Khan scored half-centuries in both innings on his debut.
Questions were raised when Rajat Patidar's debut took precedence over that of Sarfaraz Khan – a consistent run-scorer in Ranji Trophy with a first-class average of 68.53 – but when the sun did shine, the latter ensured he had the tools to make hay.
The Ranchi Test might not have been memorable, where he scored only 14 runs, but the 27-year-old recorded his third half-century in the last Test, becoming the fifth Indian batter to score 200 or more runs in this series.
Sarfaraz Khan’s numbers in this series:
Matches – 3
Runs – 200
Average – 50
Highest Score – 68*
India vs England: Dhruv Jurel scored a match-defining 90 in Ranchi.
Although India’s intention of persisting with KS Bharat seemed bulletproof, they opted to pull the plug after the wicketkeeper-batter scored only 92 runs in the first couple of matches. In tandem with Sarfaraz, Dhruv Jurel made his debut in Rajkot and nearly mirrored the former's achievement by scoring a half-century in his maiden Test innings, before falling four runs short of the mark.
His only innings in Dharamsala yielded 15 runs, but with 190 runs in four innings, he should find himself being promoted in the Test pecking order, ahead of Bharat.
Dhruv Jurel’s numbers in this series:
Matches – 3
Runs – 190
Average – 63.33
Highest Score – 90
India vs England: Akash Deep took only six overs to take three wickets.
Had India not won two consecutive matches after the Hyderabad defeat, Akash Deep might not have made his debut. But India did, and subsequently, Jasprit Bumrah was rested for the fourth Test in Ranchi.
Though he did not get an opportunity to bowl in the second innings, those three wickets might be enough to edge past his Bengal teammate, Mukesh Kumar, before India’s next red-ball adventure.
Akash Deep’s numbers in this series:
Matches – 1
Wickets – 3
Runs Conceded – 83
Average – 27.66
India vs England: Devdutt Padikkal scored 65 runs in the Dharamsala Test.
Devdutt Padikkal’s debut was opportune. Despite modest returns in three Test matches, a fourth opportunity seemed destined for Rajat Patidar. However, fate took a different turn as Patidar sustained an ankle injury during a training session a day prior to the match.
Padikkal was the only option India had, and it turned out to be a perfectly reliable option. The 23-year-old Southpaw from Karnataka made the most of his chance by scoring 65 runs in 103 deliveries, stitching a 97-run fourth-wicket stand with Sarfaraz Khan.
Devdutt Padikkal’s numbers in this series:
Matches – 1
Runs – 65
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)