Who can claim to be India’s most successful prime minister?

Prime Minister Modi, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, and BJP President Amit Shah got shellacked today, 14 March, in perhaps the most dramatic political reversal in independent India’s electoral history. Never before has an “invincible” leadership got so soundly thrashed on its home turf within one year of a record-breaking triumph.And to blithely fob it off to “alliance arithmetic” will be a lie (bought and repeated ad nauseam by TV propagandists), because the earlier victories were achieved with 52 percent + votes, so an “arithmetic defeat” was impossible unless there was a real erosion of votes.So... I will now leave it to my worthy colleagues to dissect and trisect the voting data from today’s eye-rubbing Gorakhpur, Phulpur and Araria bypolls (read along with the recent Gujarat Assembly, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh bypolls).But I would like to move on to…Phulpur Bypoll: SP Wins by a Margin of 59,460 Votes, BJP Comes 2ndPolitical Message from Today’s Poll Stats for 2019Statistics can often be stranger than fiction. Here’s a political quiz that I am sure most of you will flunk. Before I pose the question, let’s agree on the benchmark:How shall we define “political success”? By the fact of “re-election to office”, right?And how shall we define the “biggest” political success? As re-election to office by the “largest increase in mandate”, right?No quarrel up to this point, right? If a politician gets re-elected with the largest increase in his mandate, that should, incontrovertibly, allow him to claim the mantle of “being the most successful”, right?Okay, now that the ground rules of our quiz have been defined, here’s the Kaun Banega Crorepati (million dollar) question:Who can claim to be India’s most successful prime minister?You have three chances to give the correct answer. So here goes:Answer 1: Pandit Nehru? No. Although he got re-elected more than once, he did not appreciably increase his (already awesome) mandate over his respective previous tenures.Answer 2: Indira Gandhi? No, she got re-elected after she cut short her tenure in 1971, but added only 36 percent (from 259 in 1967 to 352 seats) to her previous mandate.Answer 3: Atal Bihari Vajpayee? No, he got re-elected in 1999, but the BJP’s numbers in parliament hardly budged.Three chances up, guys, you failed to give the right answer. It’s now Computer ji’s turn. And the sahi jawab (correct answer), hold your breath, is Dr Manmohan Singh! He got re-elected in 2009 by increasing his previous mandate of 2004 by a gravity-defying 45 percent (from 141 to 206 seats).Hey hey, please exhale before you choke. And yes, give it up for Dr Manmohan Singh, widely described as India’s weakest prime minister, but who, on cold quantitative stats, can justifiably claim to be the biggest success in that office.I told you, statistics can be stranger than fiction.Gorakhpur Bypoll: In ‘Unexpected Result’, SP Wins Yogi’s BastionThe Under-Analysed But Spectacular 2009 PollsPost 1991, ie the post liberalisation and coalition era, India has had six general elections. While the polls of 1996, 1998 and 1999 have been analysed and modeled to death by the pundits, the 2009 one has stayed, relatively in the shadows. And that’s been a mystery to me, because look at just a few of the political discontinuities it threw up:Congress swept urban areas (7 out of 7 in Delhi and 6 out 6 in Mumbai!)With 21 seats, Congress was the second-largest party in Uttar Pradesh – yes, UP, of all the states – ahead of BSP and more than double BJP’s tally (go figure!)Both the contending alliances, UPA and BJP, had declared prime ministerial candidates, viz Singh and Advani, making it the first “presidential” contest in independent IndiaThe Communists collapsed from 59 seats to 24, punished by the electorate for their political betrayal (more on that in a jiffy) and pre-Cold War era shibbolethsMost pundits have trotted out the rather obvious analyses for the Congress’ amazing re-election in 2009. The two most quoted reasons are the 3 continuous years of 9 percent+ GDP growth and the farm loan waiver just before the voting. I concede that these were the primary causes of Congress’s victory.But very short shrift is given to what, in my opinion, was the elemental reason, ie, that people simply loved Singh’s act of political defiance over the Indo-US Nuclear Deal. They saw in him a status quo-defying politician who could herald change on a massive scale for an electorate tired of cliché-spewing leaders.Singh Was ‘Nuclear King’July 2008: Unfortunately for Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, his Left coalition partners saw red over the Indo-US Nuclear Agreement, and withdrew support in Parliament, pushing the government into minority. Singh’s own Congress party baulked. Opposing spin masters tried to paint Singh as an “American lackey” who was also “anti-Muslim”. But he stood firm.He had pulled off a diplomatic coup which enhanced India’s soft and hard power across the globe. He sought a vote of confidence in parliament for his minority government. Some deft political management saw the Congress get new allies on board, including Samajwadi Party. Three young Muslim MPs from across the aisle – MIM’s Owaisi, PDP’s Mehbooba Mufti and NC’s Omar Abdullah – supported the government, effectively neutralising the “anti-Muslim” thrust.When the vote was counted late at night on 22 July 2008, Singh had won 275-256. His beaming face and exultant ‘V’ wave became Singh’s political signature for the 2009 polls; across the country, he was feted as “Singh is King” (the title of a blockbuster Bollywood film).Very few understood, or cared, about the nuclear nuance. What they latched on to was Singh’s ability to stand up to blackmail in the pursuit of modernity and change.Alas, the Congress misread its mandate and harked back to the stasis of garibi hatao (poverty) politics, handing a neat walk-over to Narendra Modi in 2014, who instinctively understood the political message of 2009 better than the victors themselves.With demonic energy, Modi amplified Singh’s incipient bravado into a political hurricane of “achche din” (good days), the promise of transformational change. The rest is history.Lessons from Then & NowAs Prime Minister Modi and Opposition challenger Rahul Gandhi get ready to square off in 2019, they must internalise what the electorate has been screaming in their ears across the general elections of 2009 and 2014, state elections of Tripura and North East a fortnight back, and the bypolls of Alwar, Ajmer, Madhya Pradesh, Gorakhpur, Phulpur, and Araria:We will vote you in, provided you can deliver real change to us. We were promised this in 2009, and again in 2014. But we were let down by both Manmohan Singh and Narendra Modi. So for 2019, please go to your drawing boards and figure it out!

BECOME A MEMBER

Gorakhpur, Phulpur & Araria: What Modi, Rahul Can Learn from 2009

Both Manmohan Singh & Narendra Modi have let us down. So for 2019, please go to your drawing boards & figure it out.

Read Latest News and Breaking News at The Quint, browse for more from opinion

Topics: The Coalition Years Congress vs BJP Uttar Pradesh Bypolls