ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Members Only
lock close icon

Kedar Nath Good Precedent, No Need to Revisit: Centre Defends Sedition Law in SC

An apex court bench is hearing a batch of petitions challenging constitutional validity of Section 124A of the IPC.

Published: 
story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large

The Centre on Saturday, 7 May, told the Supreme Court that the the judgement in Kedar Nath Singh vs State of Bihar is a good precedent and that there is no need to revisit it, reported LiveLaw.

The Centre's statement comes after a Chief Justice of India (CJI)-led bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday, 5 May, asked the petitioners as well as the central government to give their written submissions on whether the petitions challenging constitutionality of the sedition law should be referred to a larger bench.

An apex court bench comprising of CJI NV Ramana and Justices Hima Kohli and Surya Kant is presently hearing a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the offence of sedition (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code).

Become a Member to unlock
  • Access to all paywalled content on site
  • Ad-free experience across The Quint
  • Listen to paywalled content
  • Early previews of our Special Projects
×
×