If the conventional saying is that a week is a long time in politics, then a fortnight could well pack a double punch of change, as we experienced in India during the ides of March. On the third of this astrologically quirky month, the BJP knocked the stuffing out of the Leftists in Tripura and the Congress in the rest of the northeast. Our quicksilver commentators jumped on the “hail victor” bandwagon, but I was restrained, even skeptical.
Here is what I had written on that day:
At the end of the day, democratic politics is about numbers and majorities. Just one statistic should be enough to temper the euphoria:
“Achche Din” is now a stale jumla (slogan) for them. Its “sell by” date truly got over today. The challenge for Prime Minister Modi is to convince his erstwhile voters with a new narrative.
Nobody should uncork the champagne until then!
Gosh, even I am astounded at how accurately prophetic my words turned out to be just 11 days later on 14 March, when votes were counted in the by-elections in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Quite apart from uncorking any champagne, even the desi (local) variety produced in the vineyards of Nagpur, the BJP got trounced everywhere, including in fortress Gorakhpur, Yogi Adityanath’s impregnable citadel since 1998. Note that I did not dare name this constituency among those with an “uncertain verdict,” since it was foolish even to think about any other outcome.
The BJP’s rout was so vexingly one-sided that commentators took refuge in simplistic analyses. Almost overnight, most political pundits put on their “Ramanujan caps” to trot out reams of mathematical worksheets:
I am sure your head must be spinning around this welter of theoretical number crunching. But whatever the merit of this “what if, post facto arithmetic,” one thing is clear – the BJP will dread an SP+BSP tie up in 2019, which could singularly take away as many as 50 seats from its current kitty, throwing the upcoming poll “wide open” (another favourite cliché of the pundits).
But wait. Remember that in 2014, a chunk of the BJP vote was cast personally for the wildly popular candidate, Narendra Modi. While the Congress votes stayed static at around 110 million (11 crore) between 2009 and 2014, the BJP’s votes leapt from about 80 million (8 crore) to 170 million (17 crore). Although nothing can be said with 100 percent accuracy, one can safely assume that most of these additional 90 million (9 crore) BJP voters were “fans of Modi.” They were electrified by his promise of aspirational change of “Achche Din” (good days).
Since Modi was not directly on the ballot paper in Gorakhpur and Phulpur, can we use that data to infer that “fans of Modi” have turned away from him? Or would they be willing to give him another chance? Or has the “Achche Din” promise become the “India Shining” millstone around Modi’s neck?
Remember that Modi is a tireless campaigner. His rhetorical skills are unmatched. He is perfectly capable of extending the tenure of his “Achche Din” promise by trying to convince voters that 2014-19 was “just the first innings,” where he was cleaning up the past mess. “My real work will begin now, in the second innings,” he could claim with his trademark bombast.
Given his penchant for acronyms, I am tempted to second guess what Prime Minister Modi could coin as his re-election slogan for 2019. Here goes:
And here’s what the acronyms GOOGLY and CLEAN-BOWLEDDD will stand for:
GOOGLY: Gunehgaari (criminal) Opposition & Old Guard ko Lapet Liya (neutralised)
(Modi will claim that “I have neutralised a criminal Opposition and jaded old guard in my first tenure”)
CLEAN-BOWLEDDD: CLEAn New India Built On World Leadership & Energetic Digitisation, Democracy & Demographics!
(Modi will further claim that “you have to give me a second tenure as your prime minister, because I will now build a clean new India that will become a world leader riding energetically on our three core strengths of digitisation, democracy and demography”)
It’s going to be tough and challenging. The initial flush of success in combining Opposition votes in Uttar Pradesh is just the tiny shuffle a batsman does before lunging down the pitch to smother a googly on the front foot.
The SP+BSP+Congress tie up in UP and the Congress+NCP alliance in Maharashtra are just tiny shuffles. If the opposition batsmen were to stop at this, stranded at the crease, they are bound to get clean bowled. They must lunge forward with full force and smother the spin, perhaps even dance down the pitch and lift the googly for a six.
How? By smothering their respective egos and trying to pull off the seemingly impossible:
Craft a TMC-Congress alliance in West Bengal, ceding dominance to Mamata Bannerjee.
Declare Jagan Reddy as a combined Congress’ unquestioned satrap in Andhra Pradesh.
It may sound outlandish but reach out to Himanta Biswa Sarma with the promise of leading Assam.
And why can’t Nitish Kumar be wooed back into an RJD+Congress embrace? Won’t that be the kayo punch?
Isn’t politics the art of the possible?
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)