No one is expecting any major breakthroughs from US President Joe Biden’s first meeting since his election with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Senior officials on both sides have been careful to keep expectations for the Geneva summit low. According to , the Biden administration intends to use the summit to set out its foreign policy intentions and capabilities, with the specific aim of improving strategic stability and strengthening nuclear arms control. The Russians also place strategic stability , along with COVID-19 and settling regional conflicts.
Moscow resents the imposition of sanctions and is deeply suspicious of Western support for its own opposition figures, such as , now serving a prison sentence in Russia. Biden’s recent description of Russia’s treatment of Navalny as will be regarded by Putin as further evidence of America trying to dictate how Russia handles its internal affairs.
But if there are unlikely to be tangible results coming out of this summit, then why are the two leaders meeting at all? Part of the answer may lie in the symbolic significance of the event, for both sides.
For Biden, the meeting is an opportunity to send signals to several audiences simultaneously. Meeting with Putin only after attending summits with (which after it annexed Crimea in 2014) and reaffirms America’s and to its transatlantic allies.
This is very different from the “America First” approach and the of the Trump administration. Making an effort to improve the relationship with Russia is important for the Biden administration, but not as important as .
Holding a summit with Putin so early in his presidency also invites comparisons between Biden’s approach to Russia and that of his predecessor. Trump preferred to meet with Putin privately, leaving no official record of the discussions and generating speculation about what he might have agreed. In contrast to Barack Obama, Trump also exhibited an towards Putin.
Although Biden is a new president, his long career in the US Senate and his eight years as Obama’s vice president mean he is the veteran of many high-level international meetings.
But while Putin will neither be expecting nor offering any dramatic changes to the US-Russia relationship, this summit is nevertheless valuable for him. First and foremost, it is a clear demonstration that Russia continues to be important on the international stage.
Recent statements by Western officials, such as Britain’s head of MI6 Richard Moore, describing Russia as have clearly stung Putin’s pride. As Putin remarked at a recent , if Russia is a country in decline, then why is the West so concerned about what Moscow does?
Putin places a on demonstrations of respect for Russia from the leaders of other countries, especially the US. A key reason for Putin’s among many Russians is the perception that he is responsible for a resurgence of Russia’s prestige internationally after Moscow’s humiliating loss of power and status in the 1990s.
When the two leaders spoke on the telephone shortly after Biden’s inauguration, Putin remarked that the US and Russia have a special responsibility for maintaining global security and stability.
To turn this statement into something more substantial than a soundbite, Putin needs this summit go beyond a de facto recognition of Russia’s great power and status, as welcome as that is. There is certainly the potential for this meeting to lay the foundations for future cooperation on specific issues where Russia’s ability to offer something concrete matches America’s desire to make progress.
Arms control is a good place to start. The two leaders could build on their agreement reached in January to , which limits the numbers of strategic nuclear weapons that each country can deploy and is the last remaining arms control treaty between the US and Russia.
Considering the long list of issues that Biden and Putin disagree on, it is perhaps wise to keep expectations for the summit low. There are, nevertheless, areas where the two leaders have enough in common to justify some very cautious optimism about the future of US-Russia relations.
(This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for them. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article here.)