We have always known our chronological age to be an indicator of our health but it may not be quite so. A new study says that our physiological age (how we respond to exercise or physical activities) is a better indicator of our life expectancy.
For the study, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic, looked at 1,26,356 patients with an average of 53.5 years. These patients visited the clinic for their first exercise stress test (this exam commonly diagnoses heart ailments).
The results of the study were published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.
During their test, the patients walked on a treadmill, whose difficulty kept on rising throughout the test. Their exercise capacity, heart rate response and heart rate recovery was measured all along.
Later, the scientists developed a formula to measure people’s physiological age or A-BEST (Age Based on Exercise Stress Testing) basis the data collected. Gender and medications of patients was also taken into account.
The results showed that ‘after an average follow-up of 8.7 years, the A-BEST was a significantly better predictor of mortality than chronological age’. The researchers took various factors like BMI, sex, diabetes, hypertension etc into account while making their findings.
One of the authors of the study, Dr Serge Harb, said:
Dr Harb and his team believed that the results of this study could be used by doctors while explaining the results of exercise testing to patients.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)