No state election is the same, and no party can stick to an identical strategy for poll after poll. The political terrains vary, each state has its own history and the social composition is dissimilar.
Also, different states go to polls at different times because these are at separate points in the timeline of a party or its leader, and issues that have to be emphasised necessarily get altered. After all, people’s perceptions change over time.
For instance, in October-December 2014, the Bharatiya Janata Party followed its success in the parliamentary elections which elected Modi with victories in the states of Maharashtra, Haryana, and Jharkhand, because the sentiment which drove the mandate had not faded. Even in Jammu and Kashmir, the party did overwhelmingly well in the Hindu-dominated Jammu region.
Yet, in a couple of months in February 2015 the party was routed in an unprecedented manner in Delhi. Out of 70 seats on offer, the Modi-led party could win only three. The setback was followed by another defeat, this time in the larger and more politically significant Bihar. In October 2015, the BJP won only 53 seats in the 243-member House.
In the next round of polls in 2016, the states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, Assam and the Union Territory of Puducherry went to the hustings. A circumspect BJP aimed to form a government only in Assam and it succeeded by winning 89 out of the 126 seats. In the elections held earlier this year in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Punjab, Manipur and Goa, the party fancied its chances mainly in UP, Uttarakhand, and Goa, the last of which saw BJP in power.
In Punjab, it was at the helm as well in partnership with the Akali Dal but the BJP was the junior partner and not the face of the alliance. The party won overwhelming majorities in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand but failed in Goa. Despite this, it formed governments in Goa and Manipur by forming questionable post-poll alliances.
Also Read: Gujarat Elections: Popularity Ratings May Spell Trouble for BJP
In Maharashtra, Haryana, and Jharkhand, the BJP projected no chief ministerial candidate yet it chose to project Kiran Bedi in Delhi.
In Bihar, the party once again did not name anyone as its chief ministerial face, as was the case for UP and Uttarakhand, but in Assam, it projected Sarbananda Sonowal. However, in Goa the incumbent Laxmikant Parsekar was cast aside only after the numbers did not completely favour the party. The BJP has opted to name Prem Kumar Dhumal as its face in Himachal Pradesh and Vijay Rupani remains its nominee if the party returns to power in Gujarat.
Incumbent, Not Challenger
There is yet another difference between states that necessitate alterations in strategy and this is most evident in Gujarat.
It is the first big and politically significant state since Modi became Prime Minister where the BJP is not a challenger attempting to depose the ruling party but is incumbent.
In fact, the challenge that the BJP is facing was hardly expected because the party was in power for 22 years, of which 15 have been with Modi at the helm, as Chief Minister or even after that. The principal test that the BJP faces in Gujarat is that unlike in other states, for instance in UP most recently, and previously in Haryana and Maharashtra where it could go to people by shaming the state government and accusing the government. In Gujarat, it is incumbent and has to ward off any negativity that may have accumulated over the years.
Also Read: Gujarat Poll Panel Orders Probe Against Controversial Viral Video
The BJP has visibly been on the back foot since 30 August when the Reserve Bank of India released its annual report estimating that almost 99 percent of the scrapped Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes had returned to the banking system after demonetisation. The additional problem is that in Gujarat, Modi cannot play the memory card, that is telling people that life under BJP rule was better than under Congress governance.
Almost 50 percent of the voters in the state are below 35 years of age and do not have any significant memory of life under Congress rule.
Whatever impressions they may have of how good or bad the quality of amenities available was back then is based on generational percolation, and its role is often significantly less than personal experience.
The yardstick of judging the BJP government in the state will mainly be based on comparing life when Modi was Chief Minister and thereafter. The fact that there have been two Chief Ministers since then, is a big negative because it establishes that post Modi, the BJP has struggled to put up a credible leadership. Adding to the local issues, the vote is also going to be decided on the basis of people’s perception of the central government’s performance.
As has been seen repeatedly, during elections, the most important memory is immediate recollection. In March, the people had overwhelmingly accepted Modi’s word that demonetisation, despite hardships, was aimed at alleviating poverty and the step would destroy abundance of black money.
Also Read: BJP Issues Third List of Candidates For Gujarat Elections 2017
The Gujarat election is the first poll that will determine whether support for demonetisation remains or has fizzled out. The disquiet is palpable among the top BJP leaders and is evident through several symptoms including the delayed announcement of the poll schedule. It shows that there is no certainty if the BJP will be able to pull this one off with a margin that demonstrates no erosion of brand Modi.
With Gujarat, Modi is, in fact, entering a completely new cycle of elections.
Consider this: between now and the next parliamentary elections, there will be assembly polls in 13 states before or along with those for Lok Sabha. If one is to add those that will be held within six months of the parliamentary round, the total is 16.
Phase-wise, the first lot will be in the first quarter of 2018 when Meghalaya, Nagaland, and Tripura are due for elections and of these, the BJP has been eyeing its chances in Meghalaya and Tripura, while in the latter it wishes to project itself as the primary challenger to the left-front government. Karnataka is the next state that will see people decide on the government they will have for the next five years and here too, the BJP is a challenger to Congress in a triangular contest.
Also Read: Gujarat Elections: The Congress’ Guide to Overthrowing the BJP
The next bunch is in October-November 2018 when the BJP states of Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Chhattisgarh go to vote along with Mizoram — another state that the BJP is eyeing in partnership with the Mizo National Front.
MP incidentally is a tricky state for the BJP because it would have been in power in the state for fifteen years, long enough time for an anti-incumbent sentiment to test the ruling party — like in Gujarat.
The party knows that the unhappiness of people is unlikely to go away swiftly. The situation for the BJP will be even more awkward if the Gujarat result is even marginally unfavourable for the party. Modi will be mindful of the fact a simple majority will do the party no good.
Clearly, the honeymoon of Modi with the electorate is over as retaining states will not be as easy as defeating incumbents, especially poor performers.
(This article was originally published in BloombergQuint. Nilanjan Mukhopadhyay is a journalist and the author of ‘Sikhs: The Untold Agony of 1984’ and ‘Narendra Modi: The Man, The Times’. This is an opinion piece and the views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)
Also Read: Voices of Gujarat: ‘Won’t Vote For Vikas’, ‘No Alternative to BJP’
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)