In a democratic state, ensuring transparency is the duty of the elected ‘rulers’. That's why the rulers are subjected to scrutiny, and for the proper functioning of the state, it is necessary for the rulers to be ready for scrutiny. Part of the process of scrutiny is asking questions to the elected government. However, the questions which merit a response, should be based on reasoning.
Today’s ‘rulers’ are not ready to be questioned or challenged or criticised. Questioning the status-quo earns one the title of ‘anti-national’. What the representatives of the people forget is that, answering the questions actually clear the air, whereas refusing to answer, solidifies the doubts raised. After all, doubts can be strong, and need only winds to spread like rapid fire.

