ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Members Only
lock close icon

Pahalgam Is the Price of New Kashmir

It was entirely the responsibility of the Centre to ensure that this horror didn't occur, writes David Devadas.

Published: 
story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large

For decades, the mantra of the Central government, particularly when the Congress ran the show, was that the state government must be a buffer between the Government of India and the people of Kashmir. A key official in the Union Home Ministry used the term 'buffer' in a chat with me several years ago.

The constitutional changes in August 2019 radically altered that. The government’s rhetoric at the time promised that this would end terrorism— and all questions about the relationship of Kashmir with India. At the time, I had noted that the Centre would have no 'buffer' or fig leaf—it was, henceforth, clearly responsible for what happened in Kashmir.

As if to emphasise that point, Home Minister Amit Shah had a separate short meeting with Chief Minister Omar Abdullah when he visited Jammu & Kashmir just a week before the bloodbath in Pahalgam. He then let the CM go, after which he reviewed security with the Lieutenant-Governor and officers.
Become a Member to unlock
  • Access to all paywalled content on site
  • Ad-free experience across The Quint
  • Listen to paywalled content
  • Early previews of our Special Projects
×
×