ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Members Only
lock close icon

Lessons From 1971: National Security is More Than Just Military Power

Will there be no more Pahalgam(s) or Galwan(s)? Can any bureaucrat or diplomat guarantee that there will be no war?

story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large

Fifty four years ago, on 16 December 1971, Pakistan lost the war and signed the instrument of surrender. It was an unparalleled victory. The Indian Armed Forces took less than a fortnight to defeat the Pakistani military, and bring about the surrender of 93,000 Pakistani soldiers.

The professionalism, patriotism, dedication, determination, resolve, and courage of the Armed Forces stood out. There were many hidden factors behind this victory, leadership at all levels, politico-military coordination, diplomacy, intelligence, the Central Armed Police Forces, particularly the Border Security Force, the Railways, and the role played by the Mukti Bahini. 

The unparalleled bravery of the Indian Armed Forces has never been in doubt, but an account by Sydney Schanberg, the Pulitzer-winning American journalist, as published by The New York Times post the War, is a great tribute. This is what he wrote:

“I don’t like sitting around praising armies. I don’t like armies because armies mean wars. But this (Indian) army was something. They were great all the way.” 

An analysis of the Indian response through 1971 reveals that many minds were working together in complete harmony. Diplomatic efforts and the military preparations were undertaken simultaneously. Checkmating the United States, and holding the Chinese was a result of a coordinated national security approach.
Become a Member to unlock
  • Access to all paywalled content on site
  • Ad-free experience across The Quint
  • Listen to paywalled content
  • Early previews of our Special Projects
×
×