After the 1984 general elections, Rajiv Gandhi was the Golden Boy of Indian politics. He had a majority of 414 MPs, more than what even his grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru could manage. However, armed with this secure mandate, he made a series of decisions riven with insecurity.
It all started with a pro-women verdict. In 1985, the Supreme Court decreed that 62-year-old Shah Bano was entitled to maintenance from her former husband. However, Gandhi chose to bow to Muslim fundamentalists and overturned the verdict.
And then, fearing a Hindu backlash, he opened the Ayodhya temple, setting off a series of events which have irreparably damaged the country’s secular fabric and are poised to influence yet another Lok Sabha election in 2019.
Thirty-three years later, another pro-women verdict by the Supreme Court, this time allowing the entry of women of all ages at the 13th century hill shrine of Sabarimala in Kerala, put a similar dilemma in front the Congress. They chose the Rajiv Gandhi way.

