SC Stays Defamation Proceedings by Jay Shah Against ‘The Wire’
The Supreme Court on Wednesday, 15 March, asked a Gujarat trial court not to proceed till 12 April with the criminal defamation complaint filed by BJP president Amit Shah's son Jay Shah against the news portal The Wire and its journalists.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra asked Jay Shah and others, who have filed the complaint against the scribes, to respond within two weeks to the plea filed by the journalists against the Gujarat High Court's order, refusing to quash summons issued against them by the trial court.
The bench, also comprising Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud, observed that the media should be more responsible and said it cannot write whatever it feels about anyone.
The CJI, while repeatedly stressing that he was not commenting on the case before it, also said that sometimes journalists write in a way that amounts to "sheer contempt of court.”
"How can anyone write whatever they feel about anyone. There are limits," the chief justice observed. "... they are writing sometimes which amounts to sheer contempt of court."
The Gujarat High Court had on 8 January rejected a petition filed by the news portal, seeking quashing of a criminal defamation case filed against it by Jay Shah over an article related to his company.
The High Court rejected the petition on the grounds that the article – The Golden Touch of Jay Amit Shah – is per say "defamatory" and the trial court should proceed with the case.
After the suit was filed on 9 October 2017, the court initiated proceedings against them under CrPC's Section 202 (to inquire into a case to decide whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding).
The suit has been filed against the author of the article, Rohini Singh, founding editors of the news portal Siddharth Varadarajan, Siddharth Bhatia and MK Venu, managing editor Monobina Gupta, public editor Pamela Philipose and the Foundation for Independent Journalism that is the publisher of The Wire.
Jay Shah has separately filed a civil defamation suit of Rs 100 crore against the website over the article. He had rejected the charge made in the article, insisting the story was "false, derogatory and defamatory.”