SC to Continue Day-To-Day Hearing in Ayodhya Land Dispute Case
The Supreme Court on Friday, 9 August, made clear that it will continue with the day-to-day hearing of the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid land dispute case.
The apex court reverted to the objections raised by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing Muslim parties including M Siddiq and All India Sunni Waqf Board, that it will not be possible for him to take part in the proceedings five days a week.
The Bench, however, assured Dhavan that it may consider granting mid-week breaks to the senior lawyer if he needs them for preparing his case.
The Bench, also comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and SA Nazeer, then fixed the Ayodhya case hearing for next Tuesday. The court is off next Monday on account of Eid.
‘ Won’t Be Able to Assist if Hearing Is Rushed Through’
Dhavan in the forenoon objected to the five-days-a-week hearing of the case, saying he will “not be able to assist” the court if the hearing is “rushed through”.
Breaking with the tradition, the Supreme Court had decided to hear the case on Friday, the day which, along with Monday, has been kept for hearing only fresh cases.
As per the apex court's procedures, on Mondays and Fridays, the registry lists before the benches fresh and miscellaneous cases after notice cases.
As the counsel for deity ‘Ram Lalla Virajmaan’ started advancing its submissions before the bench, Dhavan got up and interjected the proceedings.
He said the apex court was hearing first appeals after the Allahabad High Court delivered the verdict in the case and the hearing as such cannot be rushed through.
Being a first appeal, documentary evidences have to be studied. Many documents are in Urdu and Sanskrit, which have to be translated, Dhavan said.
The senior lawyer alleged that “perhaps, except Justice Chandrachud, other judges might not have read the judgment (Allahabad High Court's)“.
He said that if the court has taken a decision to hear the case on all five days of the week then he might have to leave the case.
“We have taken note of your submissions. We will revert back to you soon,” CJI Gogoi had said and proceeded with the hearing.
(This story was auto-published from a syndicated feed. No part of the story has been edited by The Quint.)