Ramjas Clash Not an ‘Uprising’, Don’t Escalate Controversy: Court

The Delhi court observed on 29 August that sedition charges can’t be pressed based on an unauthenticated video.

3 min read
Hindi Female

Sloganeering by students at a city college in February this year was not for an "uprising", a Delhi court said on Thursday while asking a lawyer not to escalate the controversy surrounding a clash between student groups.

"Let us not escalate the vivaad (controversy). It was not for any uprising," Metropolitan Magistrate Abhilash Malhotra said after advocate Vivek Garg argued that the police was delaying the probe despite its report confirming the presence of a large number of students who, he alleged, were raising anti-national slogans.

The court also said it would have to see whether the incident related to freedom of expression.


The court was hearing Garg's plea seeking a separate FIR into the alleged ‘anti-national’ sloganeering by members of the All India Students' Association (AISA) and the Students Federation of India (SFI) at the Ramjas College in Delhi University on 21 February this year.

Commencing his arguments on sedition, the lawyer today claimed in the court that the offence was made out as hundreds of participants came under the leadership of teachers and shouted slogans “Kashmir maange azaadi, Bastar maange azaadi”.

The court, however, said "we have to see if this was a protest for freedom of expression. We need to consider what was the direct consequence leading to this situation. You are over-simplifying the argument."

It also rejected the argument of the lawyer that it was a lapse on the part of the police and it was not investigating the matter.

We cannot say that delay by police was unnecessary as investigation in such cases takes time.

Garg claimed that the students raised slogans not against any government but the nation.

It threatens the sovereignty and integrity of the country. After the incident, terrorist groups got motivated and it led to unrest in Kashmir.

When he asked the investigating officer whether the slogans were raised or not, the court cautioned him that "this is not cross-examination."

It was an alleged incident. Why do you (Garg) need confirmation of the incident from the investigating officer? This is not cross-examination.

Garg then referred to the action taken report of the police and said 100 students of the SFI, with several from JNU and various colleges including Ramjas, raised slogans after the cancellation of the literary festival.

On 21 February, members of RSS’ student wing ABVP had gathered outside the college and shouted slogans in protest against a seminar for which JNU students Umar Khalid and Shehla Rashid were invited. The ABVP members allegedly pelted stones, vandalised the venue and disrupted the seminar.

The next day violent clashes had erupted between the Left and the ABVP students leaving several of them and three teachers injured.


The court had on 29 August observed that sedition charges cannot be pressed on the basis of an unauthenticated and unreliable video, after it was shown a footage of alleged "anti-national" sloganeering held on 21 February this year at the Ramjas College in Delhi.

The magistrate had said that the authenticity of the video was to be ascertained by the police.

The plea, which sought registration of an FIR for alleged offences of sedition, criminal conspiracy, waging war against the State and defamation under the IPC, also demanded action against Delhi Police officials for not lodging the complaint.

(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)

Read Latest News and Breaking News at The Quint, browse for more from news and india

Topics:  Delhi   Delhi University   Sedition 

Speaking truth to power requires allies like you.
Become a Member
3 months
12 months
12 months
Check Member Benefits
Read More