On Monday, Navy Chief Admiral Sunil Lanba said that the Navy is looking at the leak of the Scorpene data very seriously, and has asked DCNS to launch an urgent investigation.
He added that the Navy has itself set up a high level committee to investigate into the matter.
Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, on Thursday, stated that there is “nothing to worry” in the Scorpene leak although there are few concerns because the ministry is assuming the worst case scenario.
We are going by assumption of the worst case scenario. I think there is not big worry because we will be able out put things in right perspective.Manohar Parrikar, Defence Minister
Parrikar’s statement came on the day the whistleblower who revealed the documents to an Australian newspaper, The Australian, spoke of submitting the disk to the government.
The article does not clarify if the reference is to the Australian government.
Whistleblower Playing the Tough Teacher for Australian Govt
A report by Cameron Stewart, who broke the report on the leak, told the story of how the 22,400 documents from French DCNS reached the newspaper continents away.
“He [whistleblower] has not broken any laws and the authorities know who he is. He plans to surrender the disk to the government on Monday,” the article says in its last line.
It also said that the “whistleblower’s” hope is that this would “spur the Turnbull government and DCNS to step up security to ensure Australia’s $50 billion submarine project does not suffer the same fate.”
He says he is a whistleblower and maintains that revealing to the world, via The Australian, that this classified data exists in a dangerously uncontrolled form is worthwhile because it will serve Australia’s interests even if it causes an international furore.The Australian Report
According to the report, the CD with the documents has been in Australia for more than two years.
More Austin Powers Than James Bond
The report ruled out the “corporate war angle” that was given by DCNS and said for competitors to strike, Norway would have been a better place than Australia as DCNS is pitching its submarine for their Navy.
Stewart wrote in the report: “But it seems that the story behind this leak may be more incompetence than espionage – more Austin Powers than James Bond.”
He wrote quoting sources that the data was removed from DCNS in Paris in 2011 by a former French Navy officer who quit the service in the early 1970s and worked for French defence companies for more than 30 years before becoming a subcontractor to DCNS.
So Here’s What Happened
Stewart wrote that the subcontractor had copied some “sensitive data” from DCNS in France, and took it to “a Southeast Asian country”. The two men worked there, “carrying out unclassified naval defence work”.
According to the report, the “speculation” is that the data on the Scorpene was removed to serve as a reference guide for the former naval officer’s new job.
However, the two men are said to have “fallen out with their employer”, a private company run by a Western businessman, following which they were sacked and not allowed inside the building.
The company refused to give them the data, and sent the data later to its head office in Singapore where it was uploaded on an internet server.
Lethargic Data Security?
However, while the article in its opening lines implies the CD with the data was delivered to the “whistleblower” some time in April 2013, giving the timeline from Singapore it says the data was uploaded on an internet server on 18 April 2013, where it could have stayed for a few days or a year.
It highlights here the information was vulnerable to hacking and it is now known if any adversaries chanced upon the information at that time.
It was uploaded “for the person in Sydney who was slated to replace the two sacked French workers.”
Later the data was sent in a CD to the person in Sydney through post, who realised it contained sensitive information about India’s submarine programme.
As per the report, the receiver transferred the data to an encrypted disk and erased and destroyed the original CD. The information was lying with the person for almost two years since then.
It was given to The Australian by the person, who says “he is a whistleblower”.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)