Justice Indu Malhotra’s Dissenting Verdict on Sabarimala

Justice Indu Malhotra said religious practices cannot solely be tested on the basis of Article 14.

Updated28 Sep 2018, 09:56 AM IST
India
1 min read

The Supreme Court on Friday, 28 September, removed the ban on the entry of women into the Sabarimala temple in Kerala.

The verdict was passed by a five-judge Constitutional bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra.

The bench gave a 4:1 verdict saying banning women from entering the shrine is gender inequality, and such practices violate the rights of Hindu women.

Dissenting judge Justice Indu Malhotra, on the other hand, said issues of deep religious sentiments should not see the Court’s interference.

She added that the impact of the issues is larger than just Sabarimala, and that it will have an impact on other places of worship as well, she was quoted saying in her judgment by Bar and Bench.

Justice Indu Malhotra said religious practices cannot solely be tested on the basis of Article 14. Article 14 of the Constitution provides for equality before the law or equal protection within the territory of India. 

"Balance needs to be struck between religious beliefs on one hand and the cherished principles of non-discrimination and equality laid down by the Constitution on the other hand," she said.

Respondents have made out a strong case for Ayyappa devotees being a separate denomination.
Justice Indu Malhotra in her verdict

Justice Malhotra also said things that have deep religious connotation should not be tinkered with to maintain secular atmosphere in the country.

Liked this story? We'll send you more. Subscribe to The Quint's newsletter and get selected stories delivered to your inbox every day. Click to get started.

The Quint is available on Telegram & WhatsApp too, click to join.

Published: 28 Sep 2018, 09:42 AM IST
Stay Updated

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter And Get News Delivered Straight To Your Inbox.

Join over 120,000 subscribers!