The Centre on Thursday, 26 April, asked the top court collegium to reconsider its recommendation for the elevation of the Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice KM Joseph as a judge of the Supreme Court.
The proposal for the reconsideration of the case of KM Joseph has the approval of president and prime minister.Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad, in a letter to the CJI
The letter also communicated the president's nod for the appointment of senior lawyer Indu Malhotra as a judge of the top court.
The government said the proposal was not in accordance with the top court's parameters and there was adequate representation of Kerala in the higher judiciary from where he hails.
The Centre, in its note, justified its stand in the recommendation, by giving reasons to the Supreme Court collegium for its decision, including that seniority may not be an important consideration to ensure regional representation.
It said the apex court already has Justice Kurian Joseph, who was elevated as an Supreme Court judge on 8 March 2013 from the Kerala High Court and there were two other High Court Chief Justices, Justices T B Radhakrishnan and Antony Dominic, whose parent high court was Kerala.
The note said at this stage, the elevation of one more judge from Kerala High Court as an apex court judge does not appear to be justified as it does not address the legitimate claims of the Chief Justices and puisne judges of many other high courts and "forestalls" the claim of other senior chief justices and puisne judges.
Besides the CJI, the collegium comprises four senior most judges of the apex court – Justices J Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan B Lokur and Kurian Joseph.
"It is also, in our considered view, not in accord with the parameters laid down by the Supreme Court itself in the Second Judges case and reiterated in Third Judges case," it said.
The Ministry said the collegium system was the creation of judicial decision of the Supreme Court and the terms and conditions and other parameters are also laid down in judicial orders governing appointment of judges in the constitutional courts.
"The seniority of judges also plays its own critical role. It is understood that seniority of judges of high court is only maintained at all India level. Obviously, this is reflective of their seniority and also the parent high court.
"From our records, it is evident that to ensure regional representation, seniority may not have been taken as an important consideration, but in case where the high court concerned is adequately represented in the Supreme Court and also as Chief Justices of different high courts, then this consideration cannot be, and should not be ignored all together to the detriment and prejudice of other senior judges," it said.
Justifying its stand, the Centre said that such segregation of proposals has been done in many cases earlier, which include appointment of judges to various high courts and also to the Supreme Court in the interest of expeditious action of appointments and filling up vacancies.
(With inputs from PTI and IANS)
(The Quint is now on WhatsApp. To receive handpicked stories on topics you care about, subscribe to our WhatsApp services. Just go to TheQuint.com/WhatsApp and hit Send.)
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)