Bombay HC Quashes FIR Against Journalist for Suicide of Jawan
The Quint’s Associate Editor, Poonam Agarwal.
The Quint’s Associate Editor, Poonam Agarwal.(Photo courtesy: Facebook/Poonam Agarwal)

Bombay HC Quashes FIR Against Journalist for Suicide of Jawan

In a relief to journalist Poonam Agarwal, Associate Editor of The Quint, the Bombay High Court today quashed the FIR registered against her for abetment of suicide of a jawan who was interviewed by her in a sting video.

Agarwal had conducted a sting operation with the assistance of an ex-military man and Kargil war veteran Deepchand Singh to show that the 'sahayak system' of engaging jawans for menial work for seniors was being followed in army camps, despite its ban by the army as per circular dated 19 January 2017.

In the sting video published during February 2017, jawans, who were made to do menial work in a military camp at Deolali, Nashik, accused their seniors of harassment. The identities of the jawans in the sting video were concealed by blurring their faces.

After the video went viral online, Lance Naik Roy Mathew, who was interviewed in the video, committed suicide by hanging on 7 March 2017.

Following this, an FIR was registered for abetment of suicide against Poonam Agarwal and Deepchand for offences punishable under Sections 306, 451, 500 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Offences punishable under Sections 3 and 7 of the Official Secrets Act were also included in the FIR.

This FIR was sought to be quashed by the petition filed by Poonam and Deepchand through Advocate Uday Warunjikar.

During the course of the hearing, the Division Bench of Justices Ranjit V More and Bharati Harish Dangre had viewed the video and its unedited raw footage in chambers and came to the conclusion that no offences were made out against the petitioners.

While hearing the petition on 29 August, the very same bench had doubted the maintainability of charges under Section 306 IPC. "The deceased committed suicide because his seniors scolded him and not because of the accused," observed the bench.

The court had also wondered how offences under Official Secrets Act could be made out against them. In response to this, the public prosecutor submitted that the sting operation was carried out in a highly restricted military camp.

Also Read : Chhattisgarh Polls: Naxals Trigger IED Blast, ITBP Jawan Injured

Earlier, the high court had granted anticipatory bail to Poonam and Deepchand with respect to this FIR as per order dated 26 April 2017. While allowing the application for pre-arrest bail, Justice Revati Mohite-Dere observed, "After viewing the clip, it appears that the purpose of the sting operation was to show that sahayaks were made to do menial work like taking dogs for a walk, taking children to schools, driving the wives of the commissioned Army officers to parlours, shopping etc, contrary to the circular dated 19 January 2017".

It was also observed that "merely because the sting operation was done in a prohibited area would not automatically attract the provisions of Sections 3 and 7 of the Official Secrets Act." Prima facie observing that the offences were not attracted, the bail application was allowed.

Poonam Agarwal has also filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court, seeking guidelines for application of Official Secrets Act against journalists and directions to curb the practice of sahayak system, which is pending on this date.

(Published in an arrangement with LiveLaw.)

(The Quint is now available on Telegram and WhatsApp. For handpicked stories every day, subscribe to our Telegram and WhatsApp channels)

Follow our India section for more stories.

    Also Watch