Unitech Promoters Fail to Deposit Rs 750 Cr, SC Refuses Them Bail

The case is related to the alleged siphoning off the homebuyers’ money.

2 min read
File Image of Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday, 23 January, refused bail to Unitech promoters Sanjay Chandra and Ajay Chandra in a case relating to alleged siphoning off the home-buyers' money.

A bench of Justices comprising DY Chandrachud and Hemant Gupta said they have not complied with its 30 October 2017 order which asked them to deposit Rs 750 crore with the apex court registry.

Lodged in Tihar jail for over one-and-a-half years, the two have sought bail on the ground that they are complying with the apex court order and have deposited over Rs 400 crore.


The apex court on 30 October 2017 had ordered that the Unitech Limited Managing Director Sanjay Chandra would be granted bail only after the real-estate group deposits Rs 750 crore with the registry.

It directed the jail authorities to facilitate Chandra's meeting with his company officials and lawyers so that he is able to arrange the money for refunding homebuyers as well as for completing the ongoing housing projects.

It also said that the visit to the jail should be made within the normal visiting hours as per the rules, and Chandra's counsel could also meet him.

"The jail authorities shall also arrange a place where the petitioners will be in a position to negotiate," it said, while asking them to "make the video conferencing facility available to the petitioners within the visiting hours so that they shall be in a position to negotiate".

The top court, however, had made it clear that Chandra was only entitled to negotiate in respect of unencumbered properties or assets of the group.

It also said that if any proceedings were pending against Chandra and the company, that may continue and the final order may be passed but no coercive steps would be taken for executing those orders.

The court was informed that the amount computed for refund to the homebuyers may go above Rs 2,000 crore, while there are some buyers who want possession of flats.

The counsel appearing for Chandra had told the court that if they were given liberty, they would monetise their assets and would be able to complete the ongoing housing projects so that the buyers, who intend to have possession of flats, are satisfied.

The amicus curiae in the case informed the court that around 9,390 homebuyers, out of a total of around 16,000, have responded to him on the issue of either seeking refund from the builder or getting possession of flats.

He said, around 4,700 buyers wanted refund.

The matter pertains to a criminal case lodged in 2015 by 158 homebuyers of Unitech projects' 'Wild Flower Country' and 'Anthea Project' situated in Gurugram.

(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)

Stay Updated

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter And Get News Delivered Straight To Your Inbox.

Join over 120,000 subscribers!