ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Members Only
lock close icon

No Personal Remarks in Media Reports: Judge in Ramani-Akbar Case

After backlash on social media, the judge has constrained reporting of ‘personal’ remarks in an ambiguous order.

Updated: 
story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large

After facing criticism on social media for her team ‘giggling’ and ‘laughing’, Akbar’s lawyer today approached the judge to appraise him about certain ‘personal remarks’ that had been made about them in media reports.

The judge, in turn, asked the media to stay away from making ‘personal remarks’ about the counsels, without specifying what ‘personal’ meant.

Prior to this direction by the judge, The Quint had already reported on the events in court and on the reactions of public figures on Twitter as follows:

Senior journalist Ghazala Wahab, on Wednesday, 11 December, recounted in front of a full courtroom how she was allegedly molested by former Union Minister MJ Akbar. The case being heard is the defamation suit Akbar filed against another senior journalist, Priya Ramani, for accusing him of sexual harassment at the height of the #MeToo movement.

But the former Union Minister’s legal team came in for the wrong kind of attention, yet again – social media users were quick to criticise his legal team for their behaviour in court, which reportedly included giggling audibly and whispering as Wahab was recalling details of how Akbar had allegedly molested her while he was her boss. Twitter took a dim view of Akbar’s team using these methods to shake the witness during her testimony.

Published: 
Become a Member to unlock
  • Access to all paywalled content on site
  • Ad-free experience across The Quint
  • Listen to paywalled content
  • Early previews of our Special Projects
×
×