In politics, as in cinema, facts are often sacrificed at the altar of drama and entertainment.
The Accidental Prime Minister film, based on the eponymous book by Sanjaya Baru, is a potent cocktail of both. Needless to say, the trailer warrants a fact-check. Do the more explosive moments in the trailer stay true to the book?
An important strain that runs through the trailer is Baru’s opinions about events being depicted as actual conversations in the film. Case in point – Sonia Gandhi’s response to Manmohan’s offer of resignation.
The Quint does a fact-check of six of the most interesting lines from the trailer and tries to locate them in the book.
Manmohan Singh as "Bheeshma" and a Victim of "Family Drama"
TRAILER
BOOK
'Mahabharata' and the Congress Party
TRAILER
BOOK
While the book does allude to The Mahabharata and compares Manmohan Singh as a “tragic hero” to Bheeshma, Baru does not comment on the Gandhi family vis-a-vis the families in the epic.
'I Work For the PM, Not the Party'
TRAILER
BOOK
In a moment from the trailer, Akshaye Khanna as Baru is speaking with who appears to be Sonia Gandhi’s trusted aide, Ahmed Patel. However, the exchange appears nowhere in the book.
However, Baru does say something similar in the book – but to Singh and not Patel. “Sir, I joined you in 2004 because you wanted me to. I worked for you, not for the government,” he says to the former Prime Minister on page 269.
Making Peace with Pakistan
TRAILER
BOOK
This line in the trailer by Sonia Gandhi appears a stretch because it is based on Baru’s perception of Manmohan’s efforts in building peace with Pervez Musharraf and Pakistan. While Baru does say something similar to what Sonia Gandhi is saying to Singh, it is his opinion on the issue and not an account of something he saw occurring.
Rahul Succeeding Manmohan
TRAILER
BOOK
Sonia's Angry Retort to Manmohan's Resignation Offer
TRAILER
BOOK
While it is true that Manmohan Singh offered to resign, Sonia Gandhi’s response to that offer appears nowhere in the book. Once again, Baru has written that he was not present at the meeting and heard about it from other reliable sources.
In conclusion, only one out of the six dialogues we fact-checked turned out to be true to the book. While a couple of them took minor liberties and were partially true, there are moments in the trailer that appear nowhere in Baru’s memoir.
To be fair, the opening disclaimer does mention that “characters, events and incidents” in the book have been “fictionalised for dramatisation.” However, it also claims that “utmost care has been taken to keep the screenplay accurately aligned to the book.”
If the trailer proves to be a template of the film’s alignment with the book, then 11 January should have a number of surprises once the film releases. We’ll provide a comparison of the film with the book and check how close it is to Baru’s memoir.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)