ADVERTISEMENT

Challenger Brands Rise as Nike Resets: What’s Changing in Global Sportswear

New challengers like On, Hoka & Vuori redefine sportswear as Nike resets its playbook for the future.

Published
story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large
ADVERTISEMENT

Sportswear has been the fastest-growing corner of fashion for a decade, but the shape of that growth is changing. A new wave of challenger brands On, Hoka and Vuori among them has expanded revenue and relevance at a pace that’s forced legacy leaders to rethink long-held playbooks. Nike, still the world’s largest sportswear company, is now in a visible reset: returning to wholesale after an aggressive direct-to-consumer (DTC) pivot, clearing inventory, and recommitting to performance and athlete-first storytelling under a new CEO. The question for marketers isn’t who “wins” this quarter; it’s what this competitive remix tells us about category dynamics, brand strategy, and where value will be created next.

The demand is hot; the hierarchy is fluid

Two truths can coexist. First, category demand remains robust: sportswear has outpaced broader apparel on the back of comfort culture, wellness, and the blurring of performance and lifestyle. Second, share is more fluid than it looked five years ago. As retailers rebalanced their assortments post-pandemic, they didn’t merely take back legacy allocations—they actively sought high-growth, differentiated names to refresh shelves and shopper excitement. That oxygen helped challengers scale trial and visibility faster than traditional S-curves would predict.

Crucially, these challengers aren’t growing by undercutting price. On and Hoka have trained consumers to pay premium stickers for perceived benefits (cushioning tech, aesthetics that stand out, and a “serious runner” halo), while Vuori has leaned into fabric hand-feel, fit and a refined, SoCal visual language to tempt both gym-goers and everyday wearers. In other words, they’re expanding the category at the top and middle, not only nibbling at the bottom.

Nike’s stumble is strategic, not existential

Nike’s current challenges are visible: sales declines in key periods, an inventory overhang that dulled brand heat, and a DTC pivot that—when the world reopened—left gaps on multi-brand floors precisely as shoppers returned to stores. Add a lull in breakthrough product cycles and a softer China to the mix, and it’s a tough year.

But the drivers are fixable. The DTC thesis (own the customer, own the margin) is compelling in theory; in practice, brands become their own middleman and inherit the logistics, working-capital, and merchandising complexities of retail. Nike has recognized the “overrotation,” re-engaging wholesale partners to restore physical reach, rebalancing sell-in/sell-through, and refocusing on athlete-centered performance stories. With the category’s deepest R&D and marketing budgets, the hurdle isn’t resource—it’s prioritization, pace, and product-market fit. History suggests that when the Swoosh gets the innovation engine and distribution rhythm right, momentum can return.

What challengers got right

1) Distinctive product signatures.
Look at the outsole geometry on On’s “cloud” platforms or Hoka’s maximal cushioning silhouettes—these are recognizably different from across the street. Distinctive design doubles as in-market media; every runner becomes a moving billboard. Vuori’s “best shorts for men” and elevated basics create a hero-product flywheel that funds brand stretch.

2) Community before scale.
Challengers earned credibility in performance sub-cultures—run crews, marathoners, yoga studios—then expanded outward. That sequencing transfers authority to lifestyle wear without diluting technical credentials. It also drives organic advocacy, the most efficient acquisition lever in a crowded ad market.

3) Premiumization with purpose.
Higher average selling prices were justified by perceived utility (comfort, recovery, versatility) and aesthetic desirability. Instead of discount-led bursts, they favored steady sell-through, protecting brand equity and retailer relationships.

4) Omnichannel without ideology.
While many were born DTC, the smartest used wholesale as an awareness and trial engine (REI, Nordstrom, specialty run shops), then deepened lifetime value in their own stores and digital properties. The channel strategy followed the customer journey—not a margin spreadsheet alone.

Lessons for legacy leaders

Rebuild heat with product, not promotions. Inventory clean-ups are necessary, but the only durable route back to pricing power is newness that athletes and style leaders covet. In footwear, that means visible tech with felt benefits; in apparel, proprietary fabrics that genuinely outperform and age well.

Let wholesale be a stage, not a crutch. Strategic partners extend reach and credibility—especially in specialty doors that shape opinion. Use those stages to launch, test and tell stories; use owned channels to personalize and monetize the relationship over time.

Re-center the athlete. The most resonant narratives begin with performance proof and end with cultural relevance. That arc—athlete insight → product breakthrough → cultural adoption—was Nike’s superpower. Returning to it doesn’t preclude fashion collabs; it gives them roots.

Mind the middle mile. DTC economics falter when fulfillment, returns, and working capital aren’t engineered as rigorously as campaigns. Operational design is a brand choice: speed, accuracy, and sustainability can be differentiators as important as a logo.

What could derail challengers

Success creates its own execution risks. Rapid expansion can strain quality control—the very thing that built advocacy. Growing store fleets introduce fixed costs and more complex inventory planning. And as challengers diversify into apparel, they enter a battlefield where differentiation is thinner and repetition is punished. Finally, macro variables tariffs, supply chain shifts, and input costs can squeeze premium price ladders unless the value story remains crystal clear.

Strategic takeaways for marketers

1) Design a distinctive edge, then make it visible.
Whether you’re a D2C startup in Bengaluru or a house-of-brands in Mumbai, pick a sensory signature (silhouette, texture, fit, color language) that’s recognizable in a scroll and on the street. Codify it across launches.

2) Build small circles of trust before broad reach.
Curate early adopters—coaches, captains, credible creators—and co-create with them. Community endorsement reduces CAC and increases repeat.

3) Treat channels as roles, not silos.
Specialty retail for discovery and proof; marketplaces for reach and convenience; brand.com and brand stores for depth, service and membership. Measure contribution by stage of the funnel, not only by last-click ROI.

4) Protect price by protecting product.
If you must promote, do it surgically: limited runs, member-only drops, or “gift with purchase” that adds utility without eroding reference prices.

5) Anchor brand stories in real use.
Film on track, trail, studio. Celebrate everyday athletes along with elites. Performance legitimacy travels into lifestyle more easily than the reverse.

6) Plan for supply-chain volatility.
Diversify manufacturing geographies where feasible and scenario-plan for duties and delays. Premium brands can pass some costs through—if they keep the trust bank full.

Where the category goes next

Expect the next 18–24 months to be about measured normalization: legacy leaders sharpening innovation pipelines and fixing channel balance; challengers converting momentum into durable franchises without losing their edge. Apparel remains a big growth unlock for many footwear-led brands—if they can translate material science and fit philosophies credibly. Meanwhile, the line between performance and lifestyle will blur further, with recovery, injury-prevention, and longevity entering the product/communication vernacular.

For all players, the north star is unchanged: make something athletes love, tell the story well, and show up where customers actually shop. In a fragmented market, clarity compounds. The brands that resist the urge to chase every trend—and instead double down on what makes them unmistakable—will take more than their fair share of the sport-to-street wallet.

In that sense, the current moment is less a “Nike versus the rest” drama and more a case study in category evolution. Demand is there; permission is wide. The companies that match distinctive product with disciplined omnichannel execution and community-first credibility will set the pace—from Zurich and San Diego to Bengaluru and beyond.

This piece has been written by Dr. Samir Kapur, Strategy & Communications Consultant, Author and Visiting Faculty.

×
×