advertisement
Lord’s can be dichotomous. The universally venerated home of cricket is as pristinely opulent as it is steeped in gentlemanly decorum. Should you wish to sport a Marylebone Cricket Club blazer and call yourself a non-playing member, you will have to wait for nearly three decades. That is, after ticking off every criterion. It is everything that the sport is about.
The English were not too bewildered by what they saw. Quite the contrary, rather, as pacer Alex Tudor, who played in that match, later told The Cricket Monthly:
Some called it audacity, some courage. The more Gen Z appropriate term might have been cojones. Or, in Shubman Gill’s preferred parlance, “b***s.”
The third Test between England and India at Lord’s embodied both faces of this hallowed ground. But to begin with the bit that the ‘fuddy-duddies’ and ‘politically correct’ might scoff at — the frictions that flickered at the end of Day 3.
Crawley wasn’t keen on being a mute spectator, and neither was Ben Duckett. A verbal exchange ensued, but that was all about that chapter, for both camps — KL Rahul from India and Ben Stokes from England — acknowledged that it was natural, considering the circumstances.
Gill commented:
A couple of days later, on what was the sixth anniversary of England’s maiden ODI World Cup triumph — won at Lord’s — Crawley emerged as the epitome of chivalry. Chasing a target of 193 runs, India were inching closer steadily. From 147/9, Ravindra Jadeja and Mohammed Siraj had taken the score to 170/9. Victory was merely 22 runs away, and a 2-1 lead was visible on the horizon.
But tragedy strikes hardest when it has an element of comedy to it. Siraj, facing the penultimate delivery off the 75th over, off off-spinner Shoaib Bashir’s bowling, did well to judge the line, length, and turn of the delivery.
Was Lord’s well-documented slope to be blamed? Can Dukes be held accountable? Did it have something to do with Siraj’s willow, or the fact that England always seem to find ways of winning if they play at Lord’s on 14 July (Hi, Martin Guptill)?
Such dismissals — albeit rare — are not complete rara avis in cricket. Ask India’s former Test skipper, Rohit Sharma, who might have still been a part of the team had it not been for one of such instances.
Except, there wasn’t any, and Siraj — serving a 15% match fee deduction for shoulder barging Ben Duckett after dismissing the southpaw — could have done with any form of a consoling figure. He found one in — you couldn’t make this up — Zak Crawley.
Among the highlights of what ended up being a captivating Test was how the two facets of Lord’s, and the game in general, amalgamated for the greater good of cricket’s longest format.
In purely cricketing terms, plaudits must never stop for Ben Stokes, for he never did. The English skipper began his Day 5 with an unrelenting 10-over spell, before returning to pepper Jasprit Bumrah with consistent bouncers and eventually eliciting the ill-fated pull. Stokes’ socks turned red after the match, as blood dripped from his shoes. B***s — he has always had. In abundance.
The other English cricketer who did not conceal his emotions was Jofra Archer. In a fair world, he should have been in the same discourse as the Jasprit Bumrahs of the world. Or at least, that is what many thought when he picked up 22 wickets in his first four Test matches.
But the world is not fair — it never was. And Archer had only played 13 Tests ever since, before returning after four years, having recovered from a string of injuries. And he contributed to the team’s cause by knocking over Rishabh Pant’s stumps.
Between b***s, Benjamin Andrew Stokes, Bashir bowling with a fractured finger and a bail’s cinematic fall, Lord’s cooked up a memorable Test.
The format fought back, as it always has. Will India do so, in Manchester?