advertisement
Mayawati, the vastly shrunk Dalit behemoth who once promised to change the shape of Indian politics, still has the ability to grab news headlines. She has, somehow, managed to sack her nephew and political successor, Akash Anand, twice in less than a year. It is perhaps the final turn in the suicidal path pursued by Behenji over the past several years to destroy her own party.
The rise and fall of the 30-year-old Dalit leader, dramatically elevated by his aunt as her political successor barely a year ago, is a saga in itself. Anand had swiftly become the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) supremo’s favourite after his return from London in 2017 as a 22-year-old business management graduate.
Akash Anand was thrust into the political limelight during the 2019 Lok Sabha campaign, where the BSP fought a historic alliance in Uttar Pradesh with the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD). Although the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) swept the polls, the BSP managed to win 10 seats, up from zero in the previous national elections. Shortly afterwards, Mayawati broke the alliance, sparking persistent speculation that she was in secret collusion with the BJP.
Anand used his business management expertise to modernise BSP operations, helping Mayawati to set up her first X (formerly Twitter) account, which she still uses.
Despite his efforts, the BSP fared poorly in all these states, losing vote share and seats. However, Behenji sprung a huge surprise in political and media circles when she declared Akash Anand her official political successor. The announcement came at the end of 2023, just months before the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. For a leader who had previously steadfastly refused to name a family or party heir, this was a radical shift.
Energised by the confidence reposed in him by the BSP supremo — who had till then always refused to name her political heir — Anand dived into the Lok Sabha poll campaign last year with tremendous zest.
However, in a dramatic reversal, Mayawati sacked Anand mid-campaign, after a particularly hard-hitting speech against the BJP.
Explaining the public humiliation of her protégé and heir, Behenji said that he had been removed because of his “political immaturity” and promised to review her nephew’s case once he had "proved" that he had grown up.
Not surprisingly, the convulsions within the BSP during the polls was one of the many reasons why it failed to win a single seat in the national elections, while the SP, this time allied with the Congress, staged a major comeback. Anand’s downfall after criticising the BJP only deepened speculation about the saffron party’s hold over Mayawati.
In the aftermath of the elections, Anand was reinstated as national coordinator after issuing a grovelling apology to Mayawati, joined by his father Anand Kumar, Mayawati’s younger brother and long-time trusted aide. Both assured Behenji that Akash would be more cautious in the future.
Until recently, Siddharth was quite close to Behenji, who had appointed him to several senior party posts, sent him to the Rajya Sabha, as well gave him her her personal blessings for his daughter Pragya’s marriage to Anand.
His expulsion last month followed his factional feud with another BSP leader, Rajeev Gautam, who is a protégé of Satish Mishra, the influential legal advisor and political confidante. This seems to have sealed the fate of not only Siddharth, but also his son-in-law Anand, who was soon stripped of all status and power in the party, with Behenji declaring, “I will name no successor till I am alive."
Unfortunately, younger leaders like Azad lack both the strategic brilliance of Kanshi Ram or the ruthless tactical sense of Behenji in her prime, when the duo built the BSP into a formidable political force. For now, Dalit politics remains fractured, divided not only between competing leaders but also across sub-castes, without a sense of purpose to stand on its own feet.
(The writer is a Delhi-based senior journalist and the author of ‘Behenji: A Political Biography of Mayawati’. This is an opinion piece. The views expressed above are the author’s own. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for the same.)
Published: undefined