‘Ram Jethmalani Had an Easily Melting Heart’: Dr Abhishek Singhvi
A short tribute to Ram Jethmalani who passed away yesterday by Dr Abhishek Singhvi, his colleague in the Rajya Sabha from 2006 up to date; former Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on law (of which Ram was a member when Dr Singhvi chaired it in 2011); Senior Advocate and a colleague of Ram Jethmalani at the Bar for over 40 years; Former Additional Solicitor General of India; National Spokesperson, Congress Party.
I have yesterday elsewhere described Ram as a feisty, fearless, radically outspoken person, not bound by conformism or societal norms. I will not repeat the various anecdotes published in my tweets and elsewhere (eg Bar and Bench), but address some different issues here.
For Jethmalani, Matters Were Usually Black and White
Ram frequently saw things as black and white and once he categorised something as the former, he did not hesitate to go to any lengths to oppose it, irrespective of the consequences. In the Sahara-Roy Arrest Case, we were both engaged in multiple petitions on the same side for the detained Mr Roy. A decision was taken to seek recusal of Justice Khehar from the bench, which was hearing the matter.
My candid and considered advice, which was later proved right, was that recusal was uncalled for, would not succeed, would divert attention from the core issue of liberty of Roy & from the illegality and lack of jurisdiction of his arrest, ending up delaying matters without getting us anything. Most of the other senior counsels, including Ram, disagreed with me.
Ram told me that he understood the spirit and core of what I was saying but would nevertheless argue recusal to the hilt because he didn’t feel that anything should be left unsaid, even though he agreed with me that the chances of relief were next to nil. He also said that even if bona fide, Justice Kehar clearly held strong views on the subject, which according to Ram he had expressed more than once and should therefore not hear the case. He argued firmly and fearlessly and put his point of view across strongly in that case, though the reaction and result was exactly as I had predicted.
I have always given Ram’s example when I repeat one of my favourite phrases – really professional lawyers should neither choose their clients nor judge them. The former, unless arising from conflict of interest or logistical difficulty of appearance, would be actually unethical for a lawyer, while the latter is the job of the judge and not the lawyer.
If Ram had not decided to represent Indira Gandhi’s alleged assassin, Balbir Singh would never have been acquitted! In October 1984, there was probably not a single Indian who did not think that all the three accused were guilty as hell. The trial court sentenced all three to death. The High Court converted one sentence to life and upheld the death sentence to the other two. Lo and behold, only because of lawyers like Ram who appeared for the “despised, the despicable and the detested”, that the final apex court judgement acquitted one (Ram’s client Balbir), converted one other’s sentence to life and upheld death for only one! No one would have thought this possible on the day of Indira’s death and lawyers choosing or judging their clients would have rendered such a result impossible.
Remember, Ram fought against the media and suffered public humiliation and expulsion from his party (ie BJP) for this decision of his, but stood up steadfastly for his beliefs.
Jethmalani Kept Family Together Under Father-Figure Umbrella
Ram had a very large family, and a disparate family in a sense, arising as it did from three wives whom he had married at different times under the old Hindu Law. He nevertheless kept them all together under his father-figure umbrella.
When Rani, his daughter with many qualities like him, fell seriously ill and suffered for a long time, Ram realised the inevitability and while accepting it stoically, fulfilled every possible duty as a father including spending long periods in USA and ensuring that the high financial cost of specialised treatment was fully met at all times.
The more recent death of his son Janak did break him but he never lost his optimistic outlook on life. Despite being seemingly over-aggressive, he had great tenderness for his close friends and family and never hesitated in giving his all in their times of distress.
Jethmalani Was a Completely Self-Made Man
Ram was a completely self-made man, from relatively humble beginnings, uprooted from his Sindhi environment, reaching Mumbai literally penniless amidst the throes and trauma of Partition, and yet making it big by sheer grit, tenacity, determination and back-breaking hard-work.
Yet another remarkable coincidence is the fact that two good friends and partners, Ram and AK Brohi, who started their firm in Sindh, survived all turbulences to each become Law Minister on opposite sides of the Line of Control, though at different times.
He would not miss them for anything and looked forward to them. Though he would spend time with his family, he also loved to spend time abroad with friends, attend theatre, go out to restaurants and have a fun time. He had no pomposity, no arrogance and no hesitation to shake a leg with anyone and everyone.
He could be dogged and obstinate when he decided to take up an issue. He would be rigid and unmoved despite all entreaties but if a personal or emotional or mercy plea was made to him, he would relent – not because of fear, compulsion or pressure – but because of the personal touch and an easily melting heart.
The best example of this is when he published a book in the context of his anti-corruption crusade against a now deceased former CJI. That book had many chapters castigating different people and their roles in the episode. One chapter was written about a then young minister of the BJP, and devoted entirely to that person. It was highly unflattering, forthright and would have created a stir.
At the last minute before publication, on a request from one of the close friends of that minister to Mahesh Jethmalani, Ram (despite knowing that it was nothing but self-interest of the minister which had led to the plea for exclusion of the chapter), relented and excised that chapter entirely from the book (except retaining a chapter title with a blank non-existent chapter titillating the reader). He thereby allowed the concerned minister, with whom Ram completely disagreed and against whom Ram continued to hold very strong feelings and views till the end, to save face, only on the basis of an emotional plea. In this sense, Ram always followed his heart much more than his head.
Thereafter, he would charge normal or slightly less than normal fees per appearance but there would always be an initial & high retainer. He justified this by saying that he was uninterested in wasting time on a new case unless there was at least a semi-permanent or long term connection with that cause, with that client and with that case. He believed that the high initial retainer ensured that.
Jethmalani’s Share of Controversy With a Political Party
It was unfortunate that towards the end of his life he had a big controversy with a political party about his unpaid fee bills for appearance in the Delhi High Court in a high-profile political matter between a sitting CM and a sitting Cabinet Minister of the Central government, with Ram representing the former. I would fault Ram’s client for raising the controversy because Ram's fees were clear from the inception and they had no business to engage him in the first place if they were not willing to pay his fees.
Although he had stopped appearing in the trial courts for several decades, it was there that he loved most to go and display his flamboyance and grand standing.
His rise to fame through the Nanavati case reflected his political and organisational skills even more than his legal ones. Few people know that the Nanavati case, apart from its legal nuances and salacious angularities, had early on also become a major battlefield between the Parsee and Sindhi communities in Mumbai, the single city with the highest concentration of both! It also started to assume the contours of a class war between the old rich and the new rich, between the elites who would like to be seen as not sullying their hands with commerce and the newly successful commercial and trading communities.
The deceased belonged to the latter and the accused was seen as one of the former. Ultimately, the former lost the legal battle since Nanavati was convicted but he won the practical battle since he secured a Presidential pardon. Both groups, thus, got what each perceived to be a substantial victory. In all this, considerable skill and diplomacy was exhibited by Ram, an upcoming member of one community, not only as a lawyer, but in helping to design a face-saver for each group.
His authorised biography sketches out several diverse and interesting facets about the man, the politician, the lawyer, the public figure, the crusader, the family man. But what it brings out most strikingly is the ever irreverent Ram, the Ram always puncturing pomposity, the Ram with a twinkle in his eye, the Ram of the ever ready repartee without fear of company or consequences, the Ram with the great glad eye for the opposite sex, Ram the raconteur, Ram the crusader and above all, Ram, the yaaron ka yaar.
I will miss an elder and a friend who was warm, enveloping and gracious, a friend whom I could rely upon at any time. Rest in peace, Ram!
(This is an opinion piece and the views expressed are the author's own. The Quint neither endorses, nor is responsible for them.)
(Make sure you don't miss fresh news updates from us. Click here to stay updated )