Lately in Indian cricket, and specifically since 2008 – the year the path-breaking Indian Premier League (IPL) was introduced – batsmen have forgotten the art of playing spin adroitly.
Raised on a heavy dose of 20-over cricket, youngsters – and many batsmen representing their countries – these days don’t know how to graft for runs, particularly on pitches that assist turn.
A sample of this disappearing trait was there for all to watch with dismay during the third India-England Ahmedabad Test on an untested pitch. Although India won the match handsomely in the end with three days to spare, even several home team batsmen disappointed. A majority of them were out to balls that went straight.
On the other side of the spectrum, Sunil Gavaskar grafted for 320 minutes – or almost five-and-a-half hours – for his classic 96 (8x4s) on a viciously turning pitch at Bangalore’s M. Chinnaswamy Stadium.
Wisden Cricketers' Almanack described that knock thus: "But on the fourth day, on a pitch which allowed even an off-spinner to bowl bouncers, Gavaskar gave a masterly exhibition of technique and judgement."
India lost that match by just 16 runs, despite left-arm spinner Maninder Singh capturing his career-best seven-wicket haul, but Gavaskar left a classic template on how to bat on a treacherous pitch for all to follow.
The Indian team – or even the touring Englishmen – would have done well to watch the video of that Gavaskar innings. Who knows, the team might have even watched it as their coach, Ravi Shastri, the top wicket taker in the second innings with four scalps, could have at least recalled that Gavaskar knock in one of the team meetings.
So, why are batsmen unable to play spin well, as they used to do, say, in 1980s, even in 1990s?
Maninder Singh feels quality spin bowling is disappearing from Indian cricket, and thus batsmen are not used to playing spin as a staple diet.
“These days batsmen don’t play quality spin enough in domestic tournaments. And, spinners with the Indian team, generally speaking, don’t bowl enough in the team’s net practice sessions, as they also have to give rest to their bodies,” Maninder told IANS.
"Since spin bowling is directly related to pitches, I would say that the Bangalore pitch of 1987 and the Motera pitch of 2021 were quite similar. Batting wasn't easy on both. But Gavaskar's innings was a classical example of batsmanship -- of how to bat on a pitch that assisted spin bowling," said the 55-year-old spinner who captured 88 wickets in 35 Tests between 1982 and 1993.
Maninder, however, declines to compare batsmen of different periods.
"I don't believe in comparisons. And there is no comparison between batsmen of eras. Some batsmen even today bat like the previous eras, when they apply themselves on pitches that assist spin bowling. Rohit Sharma, for example, applied himself very well in the third Test in Motera for his 66 in the first innings [for three-and-a-half hours]," said the Delhi-based former player.
Like the sudden and massive surge in cricket's popularity came after India surprisingly won the World Cup in 1983 -- three years after India's last of the eight Olympic hockey gold medals in Moscow and eight years after the country's hockey World Cup triumph in Kuala Lumpur -- the advent of IPL in 2008 changed the art of batting forever, specifically against spin.
Batsmen have invented 360-degree shots, but in the process they have forgotten to graft for runs.
“Definitely. One-day and T20 cricket has made a difference. They now have more strokes to play in T20. But even in the shortest format, you have to judiciously mix aggression and defence while batting,” says Maninder.
In Motera, Rohit Sharma's 66 was the top score of the Test match and only one of the two half-centuries of the match -- Zak Crawley's was the other -- that India won inside two days.
It will be interesting to hear what Lalit Modi, the architect of the IPL, has to say on the batting performance of both Indian and English top order batsmen in Motera.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)