CAA Protests: Is Section 144 Being Imposed to Muffle Dissent?

Does the Indian Constitution not allow citizen protests? When can Section 144 be imposed? Tune in to The Big Story.

Published
Podcast
1 min read

Section 144 in all of Uttar Pradesh, Section 144 near Red Fort in Delhi, Section 144 in Bengaluru – the rest of India is also starting to look a lot like Kashmir that has had non-stop imposition of section 144.

As the number of protests against the controversial Citizenship Act keeps swelling every day, Section 144 (which many see as “a tactic, an abuse of law, illegal, unconstitutional” way to control the protests from taking place) was imposed in different parts of India.

Once the prohibitory orders are promulgated, a group of four persons or more cannot assemble together at one place. This order was imposed in areas where protests were planned against CAA and NRC, which specifically target Muslim immigrants whether they belong to persecuted communities or not.

So, the questions here are several: Does our Constitution not allow citizen protests? And if it does, when and under what circumstances can reasonable restrictions be imposed? When can section 144 be justifiably imposed? Is it currently being imposed legitimately or illegitimately? Has it become a way of muffling dissent? Tune in to The Big Story for more.

Liked this story? We'll send you more. Subscribe to The Quint's newsletter and get selected stories delivered to your inbox every day. Click to get started.

The Quint is available on Telegram & WhatsApp too, click to join.

Stay Updated

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter And Get News Delivered Straight To Your Inbox.

Join over 120,000 subscribers!