ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Members Only
lock close icon

In Trump vs Clinton, India Will Vote for Continuity of Policies 

Continuity in cooperation rather than radical departure from the past is what India seeks, argues Pranay Kotasthane

Published
Opinion
7 min read
story-hero-img
i
Aa
Aa
Small
Aa
Medium
Aa
Large
Hindi Female

Never before have India-US relations followed a consistent, upward trajectory for four consecutive presidential terms as is the case now. The fact that this trend was largely unaffected by a change of guard from a Republican presidency to a Democratic one is the icing on the cake.

A recent report on US-India security cooperation by the Washington DC-based think tank Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) describes the state of the relations between the two countries as follows:

...the United States and India have forged cooperation on a range of issues, from security to economic to climate change. Defence trade has grown from zero to more than $10 billion over the past decade. The signing of the Joint Strategic Vision for the Asia-Pacific and Indian Ocean Region, the renewal of the Defense Cooperation Framework Agreement, and the U.S. rebalance to Asia and the Pacific all widen the aperture of possibility for increasing cooperation.

Hence, after the dust of the 2016 presidential election settles and a new administration hits the ground running, it will be continuity in cooperation rather than any radical departure from the past that the Indian government and Indians will be hoping for.

Though it sounds like a not-so-daunting ask, continuity in the India-US relationship is by no means a given.
ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

The 2016 elections are a radical departure from the past in many ways – in the narratives used, the tactics deployed, and the rifts exposed. Hence, there is a possibility that if the next administration fundamentally changes the way that the US sees and acts in global affairs, the relationship with India will also experience an inflexion point.

With this uncertainty as a backdrop, this article attempts to answer what the new US president – either Clinton or Trump – will mean for India-US partnership in areas of security, defence, and geopolitics. Are there a few common factors underlying the messages of both candidates in these areas? And how will India react to the change of guard in Washington DC?

0
Continuity in cooperation rather than  radical departure from the past is what India seeks, argues Pranay Kotasthane
US President Barack Obama with the Indian Prime Minister in Delhi. (File Photo: Reuters)

The Commonalities

Analyses on the divergent policies of the two candidates are aplenty. This article instead asks – are there a few common strands that will determine policymaking in Washington DC regardless of who comes to power next?

From an Indian perspective, there are at least three such factors that will guide India-US relations in the next administration.

ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

First, the US is likely to become more inward-looking than it currently is. Whether Donald Trump gets elected or not, the fact that he has come this far in the race itself means that the narrative in the US has found a new equilibrium.

Termed as “Trumpism” or “Populism”, this narrative – anti-elite, anti-globalisation, anti-immigration, pro-nation state, and pro-identity – will likely outlive Trump himself. In terms of foreign policy, this means that the US will reconsider its engagements with other nation states across the globe.

Questions such as “Why are we in West Asia? Why are we in Afghanistan?” will be back on the table in the U.S. In fact, the long-established American foreign policy goal of preventing regional hegemony will itself be questioned.

Specifically, for India, this change will have two short-term consequences. One, US presence in the western Indian Ocean has for long underwritten security in the region. The US Navy has been the largest contributor of ships in the region since the troubled days of piracy began in 2010.

This region is extremely critical for India in terms of trade. Should the US reduce its presence on account of its inward-looking policy, India and other states in the region will have to step up their game to arrive at the common good of security. It will be critical for India to work on enhancing its naval capabilities in the Indian Ocean.

ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

The second short-term consequence of the inward-looking strategy will be felt in Afghanistan. Over the last one year, both these powerful regional actors, have, perhaps for the first time, landed on the same page with regards to Afghanistan. But many people in Afghanistan feel that the US will water down its presence further, making the eastern parts of Afghanistan even more susceptible to a Taliban takeover, backed by Pakistan. In such a scenario, India will have to shoulder more responsibilities in Afghanistan on its own, a situation that will have significant opportunity costs.

The second factor that will determine the new administration’s foreign policy will be its attitude towards China. The US has repeatedly expressed concerns over China’s role in Asia and the world. In this context, India is seen as an important balancing power. As the US looks to reduce its own presence in Asia, it will have to rely on partners, and one such important partner will be India.

This will give India a tremendous opportunity to increase its own power projection capabilities. Programmes with the US such as cooperation on aircraft carrier construction, manufacture of US fighter jets in India, and defence relations with Japan and Australia, will be of great assistance in India’s quest to become a global power.

Continuity in cooperation rather than  radical departure from the past is what India seeks, argues Pranay Kotasthane
(Photo: PTI)
ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

A third factor which is important for India is that the de-hyphenation of India and Pakistan in Washington DC is nearly complete. The US-India partnership has turned a corner and come a long way from the days when India was viewed merely as one of the two parties in the India-Pakistan rivalry.

Though the US still remains Pakistan’s largest export market and a significant contributor of economic and military aid, the equation with India goes far beyond.

Under the new administration, it is unlikely that the US will cut off its relations with Pakistan altogether. First up, it will have to confront the familiar challenge of how to deal with a nuclear state that doubles up as a source of terror. Robert Blackwill, the former US ambassador to India, places the blame of a ‘bewildering’ US policy towards Pakistan on the lack of continuity between successive administrations. His observations can be summarised in this flowchart.

ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD
Continuity in cooperation rather than  radical departure from the past is what India seeks, argues Pranay Kotasthane
(Photo Courtesy: BlooombergQuint)

Notwithstanding this confusion in US policy towards Pakistan, India’s role remains vital to the US to counter China’s dominance in the Indo-Pacific region.

ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

The Differences

Having analysed these commonalities that are likely to guide US attitude towards India regardless of who wins, let’s look at the areas, from an Indian perspective, where Trump and Clinton differ significantly.

Without doubt, the singular difference here is in the domain of immigration policy. This issue is vital for India because the people-to-people relationship between Indians and Americans has always left the government-to-government relationship behind. In fact, the interaction between the two nation states in Bangalore, Hyderabad and California is far ahead of the directives agreed on in New Delhi and Washington DC.

The US is the second largest source of personal remittances for India and a preferred destination for thousands of Indian students and professionals every year.

A possible Trump administration is likely to adopt a tough immigration policy by hiking the minimum wage paid to H1B visa holders. On the other hand, Clinton is likely to remain more supportive of Indians’ concerns. As a co-founder of the Senate India Caucus, Clinton has interacted with several Indian IT company heads, and understands how important the issue of work visas in the US is to Indians.

Second, the anti-Muslim rhetoric used by Trump is of immense concern to India. As the second-largest Muslim country in the world, a Trump presidency will put India on the collision course with the US on this issue, and will alienate a number of Indians from the US.

Continuity in cooperation rather than  radical departure from the past is what India seeks, argues Pranay Kotasthane
A congregant listens as Martin O’Malley, former governor of Maryland (top center) speaks with Imam Mohamed Magid (left). (Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)
ADVERTISEMENTREMOVE AD

India’s Role

Finally, a reality check. It is unlikely that India will figure in the top five priorities of the new administration. The CSIS report describes it accurately.

When it comes to foreign affairs, the United States government tends to focus first on countries that threaten US interests, or countries that play an active role in countering those threats. India currently falls into neither category.

On India’s part too, it is recovering from decades of anti-Americanism. Whether India opts to get on the bandwagon with the US or play the role of a swing power, the Indian strategic community now agrees that of all the great powers, the clash of national interests is the least with the US.

The strategic partnership notwithstanding, India’s importance as a global player primarily rests on its ability to deliver consistent economic growth. This remains the base on which Indian foreign policy and by extension, the relationship with the US, rests on. Trade between the US and India is way below its potential. India would be hoping to convert a rapidly growing strategic cooperation with the US into a strong, diversified comprehensive partnership once the next administration finds its feet.

(Pranay Kotasthane is a Research Fellow at The Takshashila Institution. He tweets @pranaykotas. The views expressed here are those of the author’s and do not necessarily represent the views of The Quint or its editorial team. This article was originally published on BloombergQuint.)

(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)

Read Latest News and Breaking News at The Quint, browse for more from opinion

Speaking truth to power requires allies like you.
Become a Member
3 months
12 months
12 months
Check Member Benefits
Read More
×
×