Hyd Fund Case: UK Rejects India’s Plea to Dismiss Pak’s Claim

India has sought its claim over the money maintaining that it was State monies and not Nizam’s private monies.

Updated21 Jun 2016, 09:48 PM IST
World
2 min read

A UK court on 21 June rejected India’s plea to dismiss Pakistan’s claim to the nearly Rs 350 crore under the Hyderabad Fund case, pushing the matter for a full trial.

In a release Pakistan Foreign Office said:

The English High Court rejected Indian attempt to strike out Pakistan’s claim to the Hyderabad Fund, on 21 June 2016...India failed to persuade the Court that Pakistan’s position was untenable and that it could show no legal entitlement to the 35 million GBP sitting in a bank account in the name of the High Commissioner of Pakistan, since 20th September 1948.The Judge accepted that there was good evidence in support of Pakistan’s claim to the monies, which needed to be fully considered at a trial.

However, External Affairs Ministry in New Delhi said:

...pending trial or settlement of the matter, it is premature to reach any conclusion regarding ownership of the monies, especially as the present judgement readily acknowledges that there is much force in many of India’s arguments to strike out Pakistan’s claim of ownership.

The Indian side also cited previous judgement in the case when Pakistan’s subsequent application for discontinuance of the case was rejected by the same court in 2015 and India was also awarded substantial costs against Pakistan at that stage.

Known as the ‘Hyderabad Funds Case’, the matter relates to transfer of 1,007,940 pounds and 9 Shillings to a London bank account in the name of the High Commissioner in the UK for the then newly formed state of Pakistan, Habib Ibrahim Rahimtoola, at the Westminster Bank (now Natwest) in 1948.

The money was transferred by an agent who appeared to be acting on behalf of the absolute ruler of one of the largest and richest of the Indian princely states, the 7th Nizam of Hyderabad.

Following the partition in 1947, and the formation of the independent sovereign states of India and Pakistan, the numerous princely states within the sub-continent were permitted by the UK to elect to join either of the two new states, or to remain independent. The Nizam chose to remain independent.

However, on 18 September, 1948, Hyderabad was annexed to India. On 20 September, 1948 the money was transferred to Rahimtoola by the agent. On 27 September, 1948 the Nizam sought to reverse the transfer of money claiming that it had been made without his authority.

The Bank was unwilling to comply with the Nizam’s request without the agreement of the account holder. Such consent was not forthcoming, and for a number of years matters remained unresolved.

As the successor state to the Nizam’s State of Hyderabad, India has all along sought its claim over the money maintaining that it was State monies and not Nizam’s private monies.

We'll get through this! Meanwhile, here's all you need to know about the Coronavirus outbreak to keep yourself safe, informed, and updated.

The Quint is now available on Telegram & WhatsApp too, Click here to join.

Published: 21 Jun 2016, 09:44 PM IST

Stay Updated

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter And Get News Delivered Straight To Your Inbox.

Join over 120,000 subscribers!