Judiciary Must Introspect and Self-Correct: Pranab Mukherjee

The President said that the only check possible for judidciary could be its own discipline and self-restraint.

Published
India
2 min read
 President Pranab Mukherjee looks on as Chief Justice of India Justice T S Thakur releases the book ‘Statement of Indian law: Supreme Court through its Constitution Bench Decisions since 1950’ at Auditorium, Rashtrapati Bhavan. (Photo: PTI)

Emphasising that the organs of Indian democracy - Parliament, Executive and Judiciary - should operate within their own spheres, President Pranab Mukherjee on Thursday said the judiciary being a “critical” pillar must introspect and self-correct, when required, to meet the evolving needs of polity.

Receiving the first copy of ‘Statement of Indian Law: Supreme Court through its Constitution Bench Decisions since 1950’ written by lawyer Govind Goel, the President said constitutionalism is the primary edifice on which Indian democracy stands.

The President said unlike the Supreme Court of the United States, where judges are appointed for a life term by the political executive keeping in view ideological preferences, judges of the Indian Supreme Court are appointed through a non-political process uninfluenced by such considerations.

The Supreme Court of India last year struck down the government’s move to amend the appointment of judges through National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, saying it was “unconstitutional” and that it would breach the “independence” of the higher judiciary.

The exercise of authority by the legislature and the executive is subject to judicial review. However, in the exercise of authority by the judiciary, the only check possible is judiciary’s self-imposed discipline and self-restraint. The balance of power between the three organs as enshrined in our Constitution must be maintained at all times. It is the solemn responsibility of the Constitution Bench to decrypt and amplify these ‘silences’. Yet, there may be a possibility, and more so desirability, of revisiting the correctness or relevance of a decision as per the contemporary needs of society.
Pranab Mukherjee, President

The President said the uniqueness of a Constitution is that while the words can be amended, the ‘constitutional silences’ are indisputable.

He said of the 2,296 decisions of the Bench, only about one per cent have been overruled which is considerably less than the number of constitutional amendments.

The book ‘Statement of Indian Law: Supreme Court through its Constitution Bench Decisions since 1950’, released by Chief Justice of India T S Thakur, is a study of all the judgments delivered by the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India since 1950.

(The Quint is available on Telegram. For handpicked stories every day, subscribe to us on Telegram)

Stay Updated

Subscribe To Our Daily Newsletter And Get News Delivered Straight To Your Inbox.

Join over 120,000 subscribers!