Delhi University’s recent decision to change the admission norms for various undergraduate courses could have been announced much earlier, the Delhi High Court observed on Friday, 14 June, while hearing pleas against the varsity for effecting them just a day before the registrations were to commence.
"There is no dispute that you have to be in tune with the times. Nothing prevents you from improving education standards. No one is saying your decision (amendment) is not right, but your timing may not be right," a bench of Justices Anu Malhotra and Talwant Singh said.
The observation by the bench came while hearing three petitions challenging Delhi University's recently amended eligibility criteria for admissions to several undergraduate courses, including BCom (Hons) and BA (Hons) Economics, with the latter requiring that Maths be part of the best of four subjects
Aggregate of marks in top four (best of four) subjects of a student is considered to ascertain if he or she makes the cut-off set by a college for a particular course. .
‘Could Have Given 3 Months Prior Notice to Students’
During the more than an hour long arguments, the court said the eligibility criteria were meant for students who gave the 2018-19 Class 12 board exams and DU's amended norms came a day before start of registration.
"Can you (DU) change it a day before? You could have given three months prior notice to students," the bench said and reserved its verdict in the matter after hearing extensive arguments in the matter.
Defending its decision, the varsity said it changes the eligibility criteria for courses every year and the Bulletin of Information (BIS) was meant for only one particular academic year and was not a statutory rule.
Therefore, there was no need to give prior notice before making changes to the BIS, the university said.
Its lawyers also told the court that no student would be deprived of admission due to the new norms and if anyone is affected they can approach its grievance committee or the court.
They urged the bench not to interfere at this stage saying that it could disrupt the entire academic time-table for the current year.
The petitions, two PILs and one plea by a student, have contended that students have been caught unaware as the eligibility criteria for some courses have been changed a day before opening of registration on 30 May.
Advocate Anupam Srivastava, appearing for his daughter Khushi, said there would be more than one percent difference in her best of four score if Maths was included in the top four subjects.
He said admissions to top DU colleges are often lost over much smaller margins than one percent.
The petitioners claimed that change in the eligibility criteria of various courses, including BCom (Hons) and BA (Hons) in Economics, was illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, as it was done arbitrarily, without any prior notice.
They have sought quashing of the criteria which included mathematics compulsorily as one of the subjects in best of four subjects (BFS) for admission in BA (Hons) in Economics from the academic year 2019-20 as per the BIS circulated on 29 May.
Alternatively, the petitions have sought a direction to the authorities to implement the eligibility criteria followed by the university in the past three consecutive years, and to make the new norms applicable from the next academic session.
After hearing both sides, the court reserved its decision in the matter.
The registration for admission to DU commenced on 30 May and would end on 14 June.
Till last year, if a student had 50 percent in Mathematics, he or she could apply for BA (Hons) in Economics, but this year, the subject has been made mandatory for BFS, which means Mathematics has to be part of the top four subjects, aggregate of which will be considered for admission, the pleas have said.
Similarly, BCom (Hons) required a student to have passed Mathematics/Business Mathematics with an aggregate of 45 percent marks as a mandatory requirement, they said.
This year, the criteria have been tweaked mandating that a student should have 50 percent or more marks in Mathematics/Business Mathematics and an aggregate of 60 percent with number of new conditionalities attached, the petitions have also stated.
According to news reports, members of the Academic and Executive councils of the Delhi University had recently written to the vice-chancellor to reverse the changes brought in the eligibility criteria for various courses, describing them as "arbitrary" and "unwarranted".
The letter had urged the vice-chancellor to restore the earlier criteria for this academic session on an "urgent basis".
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)