Judges, Politics, and Bias: Is the Indian Judiciary Truly Independent?
5 of 6 retired judges who entered politics since 2014 joined one party. Is our judiciary as independent as we think?
advertisement
The Indian judiciary, often regarded as the backbone of democracy, is under the spotlight like never before. Questions about its independence, impartiality, and connection to political ideologies are raising concerns.
From controversial statements by sitting judges to retired judges joining political parties, the blurred lines between justice and politics have sparked intense debate. In this article, we analyze key cases, judicial decisions, and the evolving perception of justice in India.
One such instance is Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, a sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, who participated in a VHP event and made remarks that not only stirred controversy but also prompted the Supreme Court to seek a detailed explanation.
Adding to the debate, retired judges like Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel have attended similar events, while others have quickly transitioned into political roles after retirement. This raises the question: Are judges truly impartial, or is ideology influencing their verdicts?
From the denial of bail to activists to systemic delays in justice, the judiciary's processes are often criticized as "punishment in themselves." High-profile cases like the incarceration of Stan Swamy, Umar Khalid, and others highlight these flaws.
Justice must not only be done but also seen to be done. If not, the public will ask, "Janab, Aise Kaise?"