LSR Student’s Suicide a Glimpse Into Deep Divide in Education
While the concerned administrations try to evade responsibility Aishwarya’s suicide, where does the buck stop?
On 2 November, Aishwarya Reddy, a second-year BSc Mathematics student from Lady Shri Ram College for Women died by suicide at her residence in Telangana’s Ranga Reddy district. What forced the 19-year-old meritorious student from a prestigious college in Delhi to take her own life?
She left an apologetic note behind in Telugu saying “Because of me, my family is facing many financial problems. I am a burden for my family. My education is a burden. If I can’t study, I can’t live.”
As this prompted a demand for justice outside the college gate, and fundraising initiatives from students to help their lesser privileged peers, this also perhaps is a moment of reckoning for the educational system to acknowledge how the pandemic has widened an already-existing divide in the education sector.
There have been many more cases of student suicides in the pandemic months that directly resulted from the same circumstances that Reddy had to face — a lack of access to digital devices even as digital education gets an ardent push, or from the lack of a state-funded support for students who come from lesser privileged backgrounds.
Yet, as thousands and thousands of students in India face extreme difficulties in keeping up with their education currently, have the state and educational institutions treated the right to education as a matter of urgency in the pandemic? While the concerned administrations now try to evade responsibility for the circumstances that led to Aishwarya Reddy's suicide, where does the buck stop? Tune in to The Big Story.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)