advertisement
SA Aiyar, in his weekly column ‘Swaminomics’, lends his voice to the growing wave of dissent against PM Modi’s demonetisation move. His bone of contention, interestingly, is the gold. Aiyar believes that while the move to demonetise Rs 500 and 1,000 notes has been seen by pessimists as an opportunity to eradicate black deals, pessimists claim that these will only be replaced by the Rs 2,000 notes. Indeed, gold coins too would join the race to eclipse the old currency in becoming the motif of black money. He reasons it thus:
Read more here.
Narendra Modi and Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal are juxtaposed in Gurcharan Das’ argument for his Sunday op-ed, in the context of political moves and the latter’s impact on the decision-maker. Modi, Das explains, took an incredibly risky call against the long-standing scourge of black money – while Kejriwal floundered and half-drowned in his clarion call against smog. While Modi realised his election promise to the nation, impelled by the hope that in “the 2019 election, he may even be rewarded for it”, Kejriwal failed to see the electoral possibilities in cleaning Delhi’s air (possibly choosing to focus on “priorities that had a better chance of accomplishment”).
Read more here.
Swapan Dasgupta, in his Sunday morning column, offers a sardonic epithet to the twitterati and the Facebook club, by calling them the “chattering class”. These are the lot, he believes, that are now taking to social media to bemoan the troubles faced by their maids and maalis. Calling them nothing short of elitist, Dasgupta argues that while many of them were probably against black money themselves, they were possibly incredulous of the fact that a government would actually do anything, considering the latter a part of the problem.
Read more here.
P Chidambaram, in his Sunday op-ed, outlines the many problems with the move brought to force by PM Modi. Believing that money transactions largely give rise to two kinds of money – money that is taxed and money that is not taxed, he goes on to emphasise how the money not offered for tax is unaccountable ‘black money’. This money, Chidambaram stresses, is not exactly ‘stock’ but ‘flow’.
Chidambaram also counters the moniker ‘demonetisation’ for the decision to scrap 500 and 1,000-rupee notes.
Read more here.
Tavleen Singh, after having stayed “glued to CNN” the week that has gone by in terms of following the American presidential election, now offers her analysis of why the country voted the way it did. Likening it to the surprising 2014 Indian election, Singh outlines right at the beginning that in both cases, the media pundits, pollsters and folk in the social media world had gotten it horribly wrong. She then moves on to lay out that if she’d been a US citizen she’d never have voted for Trump – before going on to compare the election victory of the two leaders, Trump and Modi.
Read more here.
Meghnad Desai, like all his other fellow Sunday morning opinion shapers, can talk of little else but demonetisation. He first goes on to explain what he sees as the most dangerous kind of black money or ‘kala dhan’. While sending money abroad illegally is criminal – and routine income tax evasion a growing menace – the real problem, Desai believes, lies in the hoarding of money in various businesses. From clandestine activities like drugs and prostitution, it has entered legitimate sectors like jewellery and real estate. Yet Desai takes care to downsize money as just a “means of payment” – one that is legitimised only by its legal acceptability. Therefore...
Read more here.
Amit Chaudhuri pens a beautiful tale for a Sunday morning, drawing on certain classic childhood motifs, fused with a contemporary India as backdrop. His story begins from the reunion of sorts of a family where he and a couple of his cousins have come to the sobering conclusion that they are newly minted ‘grand uncles’. Refusing to call themselves grandfathers, which he finds a damning epithet, Chaudhuri finds comfort in the lesser evil. He then describes how he chooses to go to the toilet, drawing on the childhood realisation that “if you wish to withdraw temporarily from life, there's no easier recourse than visiting the toilet”. On the way out, he is joined by one cousin (desirous to withdraw from life through a smoke) and another desirous of fresh air, and together the trio head towards Lake Club. It is here that they come across ‘No No Lover Point’.
Read more here.
Aakar Patel begins by driving home the point that Mumbai and Ahmedabad, as part of the Golden Quadrilateral highway network, is one of the best connected routes in the country. This, he explains, is in the context of Modi’s ongoing tour of Japan to finalise a deal for a bullet train with Japanese PM Shinzo Abe. This train, the design for which will begin in a few days, would run from Ahmedabad to Mumbai. The trouble with investing in this train, Patel argues, is that it would be following in the footsteps of a large number of government transport blunders in the past, where the latter seemed to have focused only on the rich.
Read more here.
Chetan Bhagat, in his column ‘The Underage Optimist’, seeks to wax eloquent on the recent US election and why he believes the media pundits made a massacre of the scenario. Insisting that all media publications must practise fair and “balanced journalism”, Bhagat calls out reputed organisations like The New York Times for its condescension. While the latter had put out a statement saying “we believed in democratic values, but we were wrong”, The Huffington Post had ended every article on Trump with a damning indictment of him – before wiping them off after his win, calling it a “clean slate” for the president-elect. To the “elitist US (and Indian) media”, Bhagat scathingly directs this missile:
Read more here.