The Supreme Court on Monday, 8 January, stayed the Karnataka High Court order quashing the 2014 government regulation that packets of tobacco products must carry pictorial warning covering 85 percent of the packaging space, saying that "health of a citizen has primacy".
A bench comprising Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justices AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud was "unimpressed" with the submissions of the Tobacco Institute of India (TII) that the interim stay would harm the fundamental right to do business of tobacco manufacturers.
Rejecting the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for tobacco manufacturers, that it would affect their business, it said, "We have remained unimpressed by the said proponent as we are inclined to think that health of a citizen has primacy and he or she should be aware of that which can affect or deteriorate the condition of health.”
The bench then posted the appeals filed by NGO 'Health for Millions Trust' and Umesh Narain for final hearing on 12 March and asked the parties to complete pleading in the meantime.
“Life sans health is not worth living and chewing of tobacco or smoking of cigarettes or bidis causes irretrievable hazard to health. It is the obligation of the state to make the people aware of the injurious nature of these indulgences,” Venugopal said.
Initially one may start with smoking or chewing tobacco as an "adventure, but gradually it becomes a habit and, thereafter, it gets converted to addiction. That addiction becomes the killing factor or causation of pain, suffering, agony, anguish and ultimately death," he said.
"So far as tobacco is concerned, this is the most dangerous thing as it causes cancers and heart diseases," Venugopal said.
“If the high court order of pictorial warning covering 40 percent of packaging space of tobacco products is allowed to operate, India will be pushed to 147th rank after Zimbabwe which mandated more prominent display of such pictorial warnings,” the Attorney General said.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for TII, said that even a parliamentary panel had suggested that there should pictorial warning covering 40 percent of the packaging space of tobacco products and urged the court that it let the high court order remain in force till 31 March and list the matter for final hearing.
Sibal also suggested that the court may consider capping it at 50 percent.
The high court, on 15 December, had struck down the 2014 amendment rules that mandated pictorial health warnings to cover 85 percent of packaging space of tobacco products, holding that they were unconstitutional as they violated fundamental rights like the right to equality and the right to trade.
It came into being based on the recommendations of experts committee, the NGO had said.
The bench was hearing appeals including those filed by NGO 'Health for Millions Trust' and Umesh Narain, a senior advocate, against the high court verdict.
In May 2017, the Supreme Court had transferred all petitions against the 85 percent rule filed in various high courts to the Karnataka High Court and asked it to hear and dispose them of.
(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)